Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 1;10(10):10282–10292.

Table 3.

Correlation between expression of MMP-9 and clinicopathological parameters in Kazakh ESCCs

Variable Cases (N) MMP9 low expression MMP9 high expression X2 P


0/1+ (%) 2+/3+ (%)
Age (y)
    ≤58 53 25 (47.2%) 28 (52.8%) 1.273 0.259
    >58 47 19 (40.4%) 28 (59.6%)
Gender
    Male 70 29 (41.4%) 41 (58.6%) 0.333 0.564
    Femle 30 12 (40.0%) 18 (60.0%)
Tumor location
    Upper 2 1 (50.0%) 1 (50.0%) / 0.116
    Middle 74 28 (37.8%) 46 (62.2%)
    Lower 24 13 (54.2%) 11 (45.8%)
Histologic grade
    Well 29 5 (17.2%) 24 (82.8%) 1.009 0.605
    Moderate 47 18 (38.3%) 29 (61.7%)
    Poor 24 8 (33.3%) 16 (66.7%)
Depth of invasion
    T1-T2 36 17 (47.2%) 19 (52.8%) 0.543 0.461
    T3-T4 64 24 (37.5%) 40 (62.5%)
Nodal status
    pN- 50 30 (60.0%) 20 (40.0%) 13.394 <0.001*
    pN+ 50 11 (22.0%) 39 (78.0%)
Clinical stage
    I-II 62 34 (54.8%) 28 (45.2%) 11.455 <0.001*
    III-IV 38 7 (18.4%) 31 (81.6%)

Note: pN-: no lymph node metastasis; pN+: node metastasis.

*

P<0.05.