Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 17;27:3. doi: 10.1186/s12929-019-0594-x

Table 1.

Comparison of properties of the imaging modalitiesa

Imaging modality Spatial resolution Imaging depth Chemical sensitivity Potential applications
EM 1 nm 0.1 μm N.A. Biomineralization, biomaterial surface structure, pore formation, cell–biomaterial interaction
CM 0.4 μm 0.1 mm High Cell behavior, cell tracking, gene expression, cellular substructure, functional activity
MPM 1 μm 1 mm High Biomaterial architecture, cell tracking, functional activity
OR-PAM 2.5 μm 1 mm High Cell tracking, functional activity, fluid dynamics, cell–biomaterial interaction
OCT 10 μm 2 mm Low Vascularization, biomaterial architecture, functional activity
AR-PAM 45 μm 3 mm High Vascularization, biomaterial architecture, cell metabolism, functional activity
US (20 MHz) 165 μm 3 cm Low Fluid dynamics, mechanics, spatial patterning of cells, functional activity

aAbbreviations: EM electron microscopy, CM confocal microscopy, MPM multi-photon microscopy, OR-PAM optical resolution photoacoustic microscopy, OCT optical coherence tomography, AR-PAM acoustic resolution photoacoustic microscopy, US ultrasound imaging, N.A. not available