Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 27;7(11):2325967119885314. doi: 10.1177/2325967119885314

TABLE 3.

Subgroup Analysis Outcomea

Outcome: Study Design Studies, n Patients (BTB:HT), n I 2, % Risk Ratio (95% CI) P Value
Graft failure
 RCT 3 156:164 0 0.66 (0.41 to 1.06) .09
 Non-RCT 2 77:84 0 0.51 (0.20 to 1.29) .16
Side-to-side difference
 RCT 2 25:31 0 1.19 (0.46 to 3.08) .72
 Non-RCT 2 77:84 0 0.74 (0.37 to 1.50) .41
Lachman test
 RCT 1 21:27 NA 0.42 (0.02 to 9.92) .59
 Non-RCT 2 77:84 0 0.56 (0.29 to 1.09) .09
Pivot-shift test
 RCT 2 123:131 41 0.49 (0.10 to 2.40) .38
 Non-RCT 2 77:84 0 0.53 (0.24 to 1.16) .11
Tegner score
 RCT 2 123:131 77 0.67 (–0.64 to 1.99) .32
 Non-RCT 2 77:84 84 0.77 (–0.52 to 2.06) .24
Lysholm score
 RCT 1 21:23 NA 0.15 (–7.48 to 7.78) .97
 Non-RCT 2 77:84 9 –0.71 (–2.84 to 1.43) .52

aBPB, bone–patellar tendon–bone; HT, hamstring tendon; NA, not applicable; RCT, randomized controlled trial.