Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 23;11(1):417–431. doi: 10.1364/BOE.377424

Table 3. Theoretical reflection E-field magnitudes with a 1.0 Vm-1 incident excitation. The estimation of the variability of reflected radiation using the Fresnel equations at “dry” 15% (n=1.76) and “wet” 40% (n=1.98) SC hydration, at θ of 12.5°, 25° and 50°, as a proportion of the total incident radiation. The best theoretical contrast (largest difference) is with 50°, P-polarised radiation, but at low total intensities.

S-polarised (y axis) S-polarised Contrast (K) P-polarised (x axis) P-polarised Contrast (K)


EDry EWet 1- EDry/EWet EDry EDry 1- EDry/EWet

Angle of incidence n = 1.76 n = 1.98 n = 1.76 n = 1.98
12. 0.080 0.113 0.292 0.072 0.103 0.304
25. 0.094 0.131 0.282 0.059 0.087 0.320
50. 0.179 0.230 0.222 0.013 0.026 0.494