Table 3. Theoretical reflection E-field magnitudes with a 1.0 Vm-1 incident excitation. The estimation of the variability of reflected radiation using the Fresnel equations at “dry” 15% (n=1.76) and “wet” 40% (n=1.98) SC hydration, at θ of 12.5°, 25° and 50°, as a proportion of the total incident radiation. The best theoretical contrast (largest difference) is with 50°, P-polarised radiation, but at low total intensities.
S-polarised (y axis) | S-polarised Contrast (K) | P-polarised (x axis) | P-polarised Contrast (K) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDry | EWet | 1- EDry/EWet | EDry | EDry | 1- EDry/EWet | |
Angle of incidence | n = 1.76 | n = 1.98 | n = 1.76 | n = 1.98 | ||
12.5° | 0.080 | 0.113 | 0.292 | 0.072 | 0.103 | 0.304 |
25.0° | 0.094 | 0.131 | 0.282 | 0.059 | 0.087 | 0.320 |
50.0° | 0.179 | 0.230 | 0.222 | 0.013 | 0.026 | 0.494 |