Table 3.
Efficacy and Grade ≥ 3 AE between nab-paclitaxel vs sb-paclitaxel or docetaxel each.
Efficacy | Subgroup | No. of studies | OR/HR (95% CI) | p-value | I2 (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ORR2–5,10 |
nab-paclitaxel vs sb-paclitaxel |
2 | 2.39 (1.69–3.37) | <0.001† | 0 |
nab-paclitaxel vs docetaxel | 2 | 1.38 (0.90–2.11) | 0.14 | 0 | |
DCR3–5,10 |
nab-paclitaxel vs sb-paclitaxel |
1 | 1.89 (1.07–3.35) | 0.03† | — |
nab-paclitaxel vs docetaxel | 2 | 2.48 (1.39–4.44) | 0.002† | 0 | |
PFS2–5,10 |
nab-paclitaxel vs sb-paclitaxel |
2 | 0.75 (0.62–0.90) | 0.002† | 0 |
nab-paclitaxel vs docetaxel | 2 | 0.80 (0.32–1.98) | 0.63 | 88 | |
OS2–5,10 |
nab-paclitaxel vs sb-paclitaxel |
2 | 0.94 (0.78–1.13) | 0.53 | 0 |
nab-paclitaxel vs docetaxel | 2 | 0.73 (0.54–0.99) | 0.04† | 0 | |
Grade ≥ 3 AE | |||||
Neutropenia2–5,10 |
nab-paclitaxel vs sb-paclitaxel |
2 | 0.70 (0.34–1.42) | 0.32 | 78 |
nab-paclitaxel vs docetaxel | 2 | 0.07 (0.03–0.16) | <0.001† | 0 | |
Leukopenia2,3,10 |
nab-paclitaxel vs sb-paclitaxel |
2 | 0.92 (0.57–1.49) | 0.73 | 0 |
nab-paclitaxel vs docetaxel | 1 | 0.15 (0.07–0.33) | <0.001† | — | |
Sensory neuropathy2–5,10 |
nab-paclitaxel vs sb-paclitaxel |
2 | 2.56 (0.62–10.64) | 0.20 | 73 |
nab-paclitaxel vs docetaxel | 2 | 3.17 (1.20–8.33) | 0.02† | 51 | |
Fatigue2,4,5,10 |
nab-paclitaxel vs sb-paclitaxel |
1 | 4.82 (1.37–17.02) | 0.01† | — |
nab-paclitaxel vs docetaxel | 2 | 0.50 (0.04–7.01) | 0.60 | 61 | |
DDR3–5,10 |
nab-paclitaxel vs sb-paclitaxel |
1 | 1.37 (0.30–6.29) | 0.68 | — |
nab-paclitaxel vs docetaxel | 2 | 0.67 (0.41–1.09) | 0.10 | 0 |
†Statistically significant when p < 0.05. Analyzed using random effects model
Abbreviations: nab, nanoparticle albumin-bound; sb, solvent-based; OR, odds ratio (for ORR, DCR, AEs and DDR); HR, hazard ratio (for PFS and OS); –, not defined.