Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 18;13:9. doi: 10.1186/s13068-020-1652-z

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Comparison of lignocellulose features between the transgenic lines and WT. a Crystalline index (CrI) of crude cellulose. b Degree of polymerization (DP) of crude cellulose. c Glucose yield of the cellobiose released from time-course CBHI hydrolyzes using crude cellulose as substrate. d Xyl/Ara rate of total hemicelluloses. All data as mean ± SD of three technical replicates; increased percentage (%) obtained by subtracting transgenic line value with WT divided by WT. Student’s t test was performed between the transgenic line and WT as **P < 0.01