Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 2;2020:6745626. doi: 10.1155/2020/6745626

Table 4.

Inter- and intraobserver agreement for fracture involvement determined using six measurement methods.

Examiner Plain radiographs Axial CT linear Sagittal CT linear Axial CT plane 3D CT linear 3D CT surface
Chief-chief 0.82 (0.74–0.87) 0.89 (0.85–0.93) 0.88 (0.83–0.92) 0.92 (0.88–0.94) 0.91 (0.88–0.94) 0.94 (0.92–0.96)
Attending-attending 0.77 (0.68–0.84) 0.92 (0.88–0.94) 0.85 (0.78–0.89) 0.96 (0.94–0.97) 0.91 (0.87–0.94) 0.95 (0.93–0.97)
Resident-resident 0.46 (0.30–0.60) 0.90 (0.86–0.93) 0.82 (0.75–0.88) 0.94 (0.91–0.96) 0.88 (0.82–0.91) 0.91 (0.88–0.94)
Chief-attending 0.41 (0.24–0.55) 0.79 (0.70–0.85) 0.73 (0.63–0.81) 0.66 (0.53–0.75) 0.84 (0.78–0.89) 0.95 (0.93–0.97)
Chief-resident 0.43 (0.26–0.57) 0.68 (0.56–0.77) 0.52 (0.37–0.65) 0.70 (0.59–0.78) 0.81 (0.74–0.87) 0.95 (0.93–0.97)
Attending-resident 0.67 (0.55–0.76) 0.70 (0.59–0.79) 0.59 (0.45–0.70) 0.60 (0.46–0.71) 0.83 (0.76–0.88) 0.90 (0.86–0.93)

Values are presented as intraclass correlation coefficient values with 95% confidence interval; agreement was divided into 6 levels, including almost perfect (0.81 to 1.00), substantial (0.61–0.80), moderate (0.41 to 0.60), fair (0.21 to 0.40), slight (0.00 to 0.20), and poor (below 0.00).