Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 20;10:728. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-57582-x

Table 1.

Main characteristics of 10 studies included in the meta- analysis.

Study Year Region Sample size Follow- up time (median and range) Age (mean and range) Cancer Predominant treatment Stage (I/II/III/IV) Tumor differentiation (well/moderate/poor) No. of distal metastasis Survival analysis Result
Qifeng [28] 2011 China 87 NR  ≥ 60: n = 54 < 60: n = 33 Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma NR I,II: n = 33; III,IV: n = 54 32/19/36 NR OS Worse (positive VS negative)
Ito [29] 2016 Japan 90 NR 62.7(38–82) Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma radical surgery without preoperative therapy NR 36/46/8 47 OS NS (high VS low)
RFS NS (high VS low)
Reimers [30] 2014 Netherlands 495 NR 64.5 Rectal non-preoperative radiotherapy 134/136/193/32 25/358/110 NR OS NS (expression VS loss, downregulation VS loss)
RFS good (expression VS loss); NS (downregulation VS loss)
Mizukami [31] 2008 Japan 70 (49–168) m 64.9 Oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma operated 14/36/24/0 15/38/17 41 OS Worse (weak + absent VS strong)
TANAKA [32] 2012 Japan 95 95.6 (5.1–183.7) m 63 (46–86) Advanced esophageal radical esophagectomy I,II: n = 54; III,IV: n = 41 NR 0 OS All stage: worse; I/II: NS; III/IV: worse (downregulation VS up)
Zhang [33] 2012 China 105 14 (4–40) m  ≤ 59: n = 50 > 59: n = 55 Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma Radiotherapy or chemotherapy I/II: n = 27; III/IV: n = 78 Well + moderate: n = 62; Poor: n = 43 NR OS Good (strong VS weak)
Study Year Region Sample size Follow- up time (median and range) Age (mean and range) Cancer Predominant treatment Stage (I/II/III/IV) Tumor differentiation (well/moderate/poor) No. of distal metastasis Survival analysis Result
Umemoto[34] 2014 Japan 80 2427 d 62.8 Hepatocellular carcinoma Hepatectomy I,II: n = 21; II,IV: n = 15 Well/moderate: n = 20; poor: n = 16 NR OS NS (high VS low)
Imai [35] 2017 Japan 36 NR 68.2 Pancreatic cancer pancreatic resection I,II: n = 24; III,IV: n = 12 Well: n = 25; moderate and poor: n = 11 NR OS Good (high VS low)
RFS Good (high VS low)
Moller [13] 1991 Germany 152 48 (45–65) m 66 Colorectal carcinoma1 Surgery 52/48/52/0 17/112/23 NR RFS Worse (normal VS reduced)
Iwayama [36] 2015 Japan 97 54 m (31–83) Colorectal cancer Chemotherapy II: n = 97 Well/moderate: n = 88; poor: n = 9 NR RFS Worse (negative VS positive)