Skip to main content
. 2019 May 10;36(1):1–10. doi: 10.1007/s12550-019-00360-0

Table 2.

Chemical shift of the 1H-NMR signals of OTB-GSH and OTB-NAC in comparison to OTA (see Fig. 1 for structure and numbering) (NMR measurements were performed in d4-methanol/D2O/d2-formic acid (70/30/0.1, v/v/v), literature data of OTB-NAC by Tozlovanu et al. 2012 were obtained in d6-DMSO)

No. H OTB-GSH OTB-NAC OTB-NAC
(Tozlovanu et al. 2012)
OTA
δ 1H (ppm) δ 1H (ppm) δ 1H (ppm) δ 1H (ppm)
3 4.79 4.80 4.39 4.85
4.1/4.2 2.98 ו 3.55 2.92 ו 3.52 2.55 ו 3.35 2.91 ו 3.35
6 8.35 8.40 8.06 8.18
10 1.56 1.55 1.34 1.56
2′ 4.85 4.93 4.43 4.92
3'.1/3'.2 3.18 ו 3.31 3.20 ו 3.34 3.08 3.12 3.20 ו 3.32
5′–9′ 7.31–7.18 7.31–7.22 7.23–7.19 7.32–7.23
1''.1/1''.2 3.03 ו 3.32 3.14 ו 3.38 2.81 ו 3.06
2″ 4.27 4.39 3.91
5″ 2.55 1.96 1.75
6″ 2.23–2.08
7″ 3.69
11″ 3.81