Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 20;8(2):e14342. doi: 10.14814/phy2.14342

Table 3.

Fatigue threshold values across methodologies. All fatigue thresholds were derived from exercise test 1 and were assessed via repeated measurements ANOVA with a Bonferroni correction to control for type I error across multiple comparisons

Method absVO2 relVO2 %VO2max W·kg−0.32 %Wmax
VEQ 2.56 ± 0.49 640.8 ± 119.3 63.4 ± 8.1 49.3 ± 12.0 56.2 ± 9.0
ExCO2 2.72 ± 0.60 678.5 ± 147.4 66.9 ± 9.7 52.6 ± 13.9 59.8 ± 10.9
V‐Slope 2.73 ± 0.70 682.0 ± 173.1 67.2 ± 13.1 53.4 ± 16.9 60.6 ± 15.3
VTavg 2.67 ± 0.57 667.1 ± 140.5 65.8 ± 9.4 51.8 ± 13.7 58.9 ± 10.9

Fatigue threshold variables consist of absolute (abs; l O2·min−1) and relative (rel; ml O2·min−1·kg−0.32) measures of oxygen consumption (VO2) or power output (W·kg−0.32), as well as % of maximal VO2 (%VO2max) or power (%Wmax) determined through different methods: ventilatory equivalent method (VEQ); excess carbon dioxide method (ExCO2); modified V‐slope method (V‐slope); and the average of VEQ, ExCO2, and V‐Slope methods (VTavg). Data reported as mean ± SD.