Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 6;17:101015. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.101015

Table 4.

Secondary Data Sources to Support Strengthening Data for Better Public Health Surveillance.

Data Elements (by Topic) Sources Strengths and Limitations
Prescription drug monitoring data
Detection of opioid misuse
  • Prescription name/type

  • Prescription dose

  • Prescriber

  • Payment

  • State PDMP

  • PBSS

Strengths:
  • +

    Comprehensive data on prescribing (i.e., multi-payer)

  • +

    Can be used to develop measures around patient, prescriber, and pharmacist risky behaviors

Limitations:
  • -

    Access barriers

  • -

    State capacity issues may limit ability to link PDMP data with other datasets

Mortality data
Opioid-related overdose
  • Cause of death

  • Drugs involved in death

  • Demographics

  • NDI

  • NVSS MCOD

  • CDC WONDER*

  • State vital records

Strengths:
  • +

    National data with information on opioid overdose mortality

  • +

    CDC WONDER is readily downloadable and publicly available

Limitations:
  • -

    Lags in data availability

  • -

    Variation in quality of reporting detail on drug involvement

Other national sources
Detection of opioid misuse
  • Inpatient stays and ED visits

  • Nonfatal overdose

  • Opioid use disorder

  • Diagnoses and procedures

  • HCUP (national and state inpatient and emergency department databases)

Strengths:
  • +

    Large collection of longitudinal data, nation-wide and state-level

  • +

    State data is mapped to a standardized format

Limitations:
  • -

    Not all states participate in the three state-level databases

  • -

    Costs to obtain full datasets

Enhanced state opioid overdose surveillance Strengths:
  • +

    Very rich detail integrated from ED hospital billing, EMS, and syndromic surveillance data

  • +

    Timely data availability and comparability across jurisdictions

Limitations:
  • -

    Not currently available for all states

Toxico-surveillance
  • Opioid-related poison center calls

  • Exposure type (e.g., intentional abuse exposures)

Poison Control
  • NPDS

Strengths:
  • +

    Product and drug specific information

Limitations:
  • -

    Must be requested and purchased

  • -

    Lags in availability vary by poison center

Product-specific use & trends
  • Opioid use/initiation

  • Route of administration

Toxico-surveillance
  • Nonfatal opioid overdose

Illicit opioid markets
  • Source of opioids

Proprietary surveillance
  • RADARS

  • NAVIPPRO

Strengths:
  • +

    Multifaceted data collection including product and drug specific information

  • +

    Can identify exposure among high-risk groups (e.g., pregnant women)

  • +

    RADARS has information on product street prices

Limitations:
  • -

    Not nationally representative

  • -

    Possible sampling biases

  • -

    Costs to obtain

Toxico-surveillance
  • Opioid-related ED visits

  • Substance with composition and formulation-specific differentiation

ED surveillance
  • DAWN*

Strengths:
  • +

    Nationally representative and generalizable

  • +

    Mortality data available for a subset of states

Limitations:
  • -

    Discontinued in 2011

  • -

    Possible sampling and information biases

Illicit opioid markets
  • Drug category; drug chemistry

  • Prevalence and location of emerging drugs

  • Street price (STRIDE)

Drug seizure or testing data
  • NFLIS

  • STRIDE

Strengths:
  • +

    Data on illicit drug supply, prices, and purity

  • +

    Seizure data often available with less lag time

  • +

    Useful in constructing models of the likely course of the epidemic

Limitations:
  • -

    Access barriers (particularly for sub-state data)

  • -

    Some drugs seizures are not analyzed by participating laboratories

Other state and local sources
Illicit opioid markets
  • Criminal history

  • Drug-related offenses and arrests

  • Demographics

Drug arrest data from state or local criminal justice agencies Strengths:
  • +

    Could be used to examine network patterns of co-arrests

  • +

    If linked with other data, can assess systematic histories leading to arrest

Limitations:
  • -

    Often not available in electronic form that is usable

  • -

    Difficulties in obtaining data use permissions

Detection of opioid misuse
  • Opioid-related inpatient stays and ED visits

  • Diagnoses and procedures

  • Costs

HCUP (State Inpatient and State Emergency Department Databases) Strengths:
  • +

    Large collection of state-level longitudinal data

  • +

    State data is mapped to a standardized format

Limitations:
  • -

    Not all states participate

  • -

    Costs to obtain full datasets

State inpatient, ED, mortality, or syndromic surveillance sources Strengths:
  • +

    Often available with less time lag than national sources

  • +

    May be linkable to variety of state data sources

Limitations:
  • -

    Access and cost barriers vary across sources

  • -

    State-specific so challenges for cross-state comparison

National surveys
Illicit opioid markets
  • Self-reported drug use

  • Urinalysis test results

  • Substance abuse treatment history

  • Drug acquisition and payment

Arrestee Survey
  • ADAM*

Strengths:
  • +

    Captures a high-risk population with uniform data collection across sites

Limitations:
  • -

    Limited to few sites collecting data and male arrestees only

  • -

    No longer fully operational

  • -

    Certain data elements are restricted access

*

Publicly available at no cost.