Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 14;43(2):358–365. doi: 10.2337/dc19-1483

Table 2.

HRs and 95% CI for dietary LA in quintiles and per 5% energy and incident type 2 diabetes in 3,257 post-MI patients from the Alpha Omega Cohort

Quintiles of dietary LA Per 5% energy P value
Q1 (n = 651) Q2 (n = 652) Q3 (n = 651) Q4 (n = 652) Q5 (n = 651) P-trend*
Median dietary LA, % energy 3.5 4.6 5.6 6.8 8.8
Cases 37 30 34 39 31
Model 1 1.00 0.79 (0.49, 1.28) 0.90 (0.56, 1.43) 1.04 (0.66, 1.64) 0.81 (0.50, 1.31) 0.72 1.01 (0.70, 1.44) 0.96
Model 2 1.00 0.80 (0.49, 1.29) 0.95 (0.59, 1.51) 1.12 (0.71, 1.76) 0.88 (0.54, 1.44) 0.97 1.09 (0.76, 1.58) 0.64
Model 3§ 1.00 0.72 (0.44, 1.19) 0.86 (0.51, 1.45) 1.01 (0.56, 1.81) 0.78 (0.36, 1.72) 0.84 1.18 (0.59, 2.35) 0.64

% energy, percentage of total energy intake, excluding energy from alcohol.

*

P values for trend were obtained by assigning each patient median dietary LA for the category and this value was modeled as continuous.

Model 1 was adjusted for age (continuous; years), sex (men/women), and Alpha Omega Trial treatment code (four categories).

Model 2: model 1 plus physical activity (three categories), smoking status (three categories), educational level (four categories), BMI (continuous; kg/m2), family history of type 2 diabetes (yes/no), total energy intake (excluding calories from alcohol, continuous; kcal/day), alcohol consumption (four categories), dietary fiber (g/day; continuous), and dietary cholesterol (mg/day; continuous).

§

Model 3 (substitution of SFA and TFA for LA): model 2 plus dietary protein (% energy; continuous), carbohydrates (% energy; continuous), n-3 PUFAs (% energy; continuous), and cis-MUFAs (% energy; continuous).