Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 13;37(6):591–608. doi: 10.3233/RNN-190939

Table 1.

The number of letters (columns 2–5, from left to right), fixation times (first column on the left) and mean speech onset times (bottom row) at which 40 dyslexic children were able to read at least 95% of the pseudowords correctly

Fixation Time Number of Letters Recognized
3 Letters 4 Letters 5 Letters 6 Letters
Number of Subjects who Recognized >95% of the Pseudowords Correctly
250 ms 3 (T:2; C:1) 5 (T:2; C: 3) 7 (T:3; C:4) 3 (T:2; C:1)
300 ms 2 (T:1; C:1)
350 ms 1 (C) 2 (T:1; C:1) 3 (T:1; C:2)
400 ms 1 (T) 3 (T:2; C1) 1 (T) 2 (C)
450 ms 1 (T) 5 (T:3; C:2)
500 ms 1 (C)
Σ subjects 7 17 11 5
Speech Onset Latency X = 1617.53 ms X = 1524.02 ms X = 1635.96 ms X = 1579.45 ms
SD = 449.20 ms SD = 548.51 ms SD = 472.91 ms SD = 348.61 ms

First column on the left: presentation times (i. e. fixation times) of the pseudowords; second column: number of subjects who were able to read 3-letter pseudowords within fixation times between 250 and 500 ms; third column: number of subjects who were able to read 4-letter pseudowords within fixation times between 250 and 500 ms; fourth column: number of subjects who were able to read 5-letter pseudowords within fixation times between 250 and 500 ms. Fifth column: number of subjects who were able to read 6-letter pseudowords within fixation times between 250 and 500 ms. Bottom row: means and standard deviations of speech onset latencies. Brackets indicate the number of children who belonged to the therapy group or control group: T: therapy group; C: control group.