Table 2.
Published studies meeting inclusion criteria by key domains of focus reported on in the study (per Donabedian [24], as described above)
| Short reference | Research organisation forming focus of study | Reflects and/or reports on … | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| structures of RIA? | processes of RIA? | outcomes of RIA? | ||
| Searles et al. ‘An approach to measuring and encouraging research translation and research impact’ [25] | Hunter Medical Research Institute, Australia | ✔ | ✔ | |
| Greenhalgh et al. ‘Maximising value from a United Kingdom Biomedical Research Centre: study protocol’ [26] | National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, United Kingdom | ✔ | ||
| Trochim et al. ‘Evaluation guidelines for the Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSAs)’ [27] | National Institutes of Health (CTSA funding programme), US | ✔ | ||
| Rubio et al. ‘Developing Common Metrics for the Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSAs): Lessons Learned’ [28] | National Institutes of Health (CTSA programme), US | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
| McLean et al. ‘Understanding the performance and impact of public knowledge translation funding interventions: protocol for an evaluation of Canadian Institutes of Health Research knowledge translation funding programs’ [29] | Canadian Institutes of Health Research (knowledge translation funding programme), Canada | ✔ | ✔ | |