Table 2.
IKT categories derived from group discussions
| Category | Sub-category | Description |
|---|---|---|
| IKT theory | Frameworks | IKT frameworks need to be identified, developed and validated |
| Clarity | Greater theoretical clarity about IKT is required; the underlying assumptions of IKT need to be made explicit | |
| IKT methods | Search filters | Search filters that identify IKT concepts in the literature are required |
| IKT data collection | Development of approaches to obtaining meaningful data that illustrate the impact of IKT is required; considerations include embedded research from the health system and sampling from multiple populations for IKT outcomes | |
| Outcomes | Specific IKT outcomes need to be identified | |
| Evaluation | Tools for evaluating IKT need to be identified or developed and validated | |
| Reporting guidelines | Report standards for IKT research studies are required | |
| IKT processes | Initiating IKT | Identify strategies to initiate engagement with KUs |
| Describing KU | Describe who the KUs are that are using IKT processes | |
| Accountability | Identify who is accountable for the IKT process | |
| Indicators of success | Identifying indicators of IKT success | |
| Governance and leadership | Identify the governance structure for research required to support IKT | |
| Promoting partnership | Level of partnership | Ensuring that KUs are involved in the research priority-setting and engaged with at the highest level of partnership; ensuring engagement is genuine and not tokenism |
| Diversity | Accounting for diverse perspectives in the partnership process of IKT | |
| Experiences | Need for detailed reporting on the characteristics and experiences of various knowledge user types involved in the IKT partnership | |
| KU needs | Identifying and supporting the KU’s needs throughout the partnership | |
| Safe spaces | Ensure safe participatory spaces for KUs | |
| Researcher reciprocation | Identifying ways for researchers to meet the needs of vulnerable groups | |
| KU reimbursement and IKT cost | Reimbursing KUs for their time and costs associated with collaboration | |
| Definitions and distinctions | Distinguishing IKT from other concepts and approaches | Define and distinguish IKT from patient-oriented research, quality improvement, other designs and methods, learning health systems, implementation science |
| Capacity-building | Repository | Create a repository of IKT frameworks, tools and publications |
| Trainees | Develop a vision for building IKT capacity in trainees | |
| Role of funders | Funding and costs | Examining how funders should account for the added cost of IKT |
| Funders as KUs | Determining how and whether funders should be KUs | |
| Peer-review | Exploring the impact of peer-reviewers on grant success | |
| Structures | Changing the funding structures to support IKT and KU partnership |
IKT integrated knowledge translation, KU knowledge user