Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 20;122(5):613–621. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.02.010

Table 2.

Summary of statistical comparisons for each data set, outlining P-values for each pairwise comparison between and within phenotype for the mass-specific oxygen flux (pmol s−1 mg−1) and flux control ratio (FCR) readings. The P-values for FCR differences between MHS subgroups are also included with post hoc statistics for each comparison. P-values reaching statistical significance are presented in bold font. ETS, electron transport system; MHN, malignant hyperthermia-negative; MHS, malignant hyperthermia-susceptible; MHSh, abnormal response in the in vitro contracture test to halothane but not caffeine; MHShc, abnormal response in the in vitro contracture test to halothane and caffeine; OXPHOS, oxidative phosphorylation

Respiratory state Oxygen consumption rate (pmol s−1 mg−1)
MHN
MHS
MHN vs MHS
Control vs halothane-exposure (P-value) Control comparisons (P-value)
Leak 0.944 0.429 0.732
CI(OXPHOS) 0.593 0.012 0.113
CI+CII(OXPHOS) 0.789 0.005 0.071
CI+CII(ETS) 0.157 0.003 0.050
CII(ETS) 0.057 0.001 0.376
CIV(MAX)
0.718
0.101
0.021
Respiratory state Flux control ratio (FCR)
MHN MHS MHN vs MHS
Control vs halothane-exposure (P-value)
Control comparisons (P-value)
LEAK 0.753 0.362 0.074
CI(OXPHOS) 0.480 0.007 0.534
CI+CII(OXPHOS) 0.470 0.003 0.033
CI+CII(ETS)
CII(ETS) 0.041 0.001 0.005
CIV(MAX)
0.307
0.052
0.913
Respiratory state FCR differences (halothane-exposed - control)
Kruskal-Wallis (P-value) Post hoc (P-value)

MHN vs MHSh
MHN vs MHShc
MHShvs MHShc
LEAK 0.349
CI(OXPHOS) 0.209
CI+CII(OXPHOS) 0.043 1.000 0.036 0.390
CI+CII(ETS) 0.086
CII(ETS) 0.263
CIV(MAX) 0.532