Table 1.

Sampling design in landscape genomics studies: a nonexhaustive list of landscape genomics studies, highlighting different species and their related sampling strategies

Study	Species	Sampling design (D)	Sampling locations (L)	Sample size (S)
Colli et al. (2014)	Goat	Spatial and breed representativeness	10 sites	43
Pariset et al. (2009)	Goat	Spatial and breed representativeness	16 regions	497
Stucki et al. (2017) and Vajana et al. (2018)	Cattle	Spatial representativeness	51 regions	813
Harris and Munshi‐South (2017)	White‐footed mouse	Habitat representativeness	6 sites	48
Stronen et al. (2015)	Wolf	Opportunistic, population representativeness	59 sites	59
Wenzel et al. (2016)	Red grouse	Spatial representativeness	21 sites	231
Crossley et al. (2017)	Potato beetle	Habitat representativeness	16 sites	192
Dudaniec et al. (2018)	Damselfly	Environmental and spatial representativeness	25 sites	426
Theodorou et al. (2018)	Red‐tailed bumblebee	Habitat representativeness	18 sites	198
Abebe et al. (2015)	Barley	Spatial representativeness	10 regions	260
De Kort et al. (2014)	Black alder	Spatial and habitat representativeness	24 populations	356
Pluess et al. (2016)	European beech	Spatial and environmental representativeness	79 populations	234
Yoder et al. (2014)	Barrelclover	Spatial representativeness	202 sites	202
DiBattista et al. (2017)	Stripey snapper	Spatial representativeness	51 sites	1,016
Hecht et al. (2015)	Chinook salmon	Spatial representativeness	53 sites	1,956
Laporte et al. (2016)	European eel	Spatial and environmental representativeness	8 sites	179
Vincent et al. (2013)	Atlantic salmon	Spatial representativeness	26a rivers	641a

^aNumbers from the Vincent et al. report (2013) concerning the non‐pooled samples.