Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 28;76(1):199–208. doi: 10.1111/jan.14222

Table 1.

Clusters in relation to sample characteristics and students’ perceptions of the Bachelor of Science in Nursing (BSN) programme

Variables Cluster p values
1/passed N = 36 2/passed N = 69 3/failed N = 65
Gender, male/female, N = 169 6/29 8/61 11/54 .623b
Age, years, N = 168, mean (SD) 29.2 (6.9) 26.9 (5.3) 27.9 (6.9) .200a
General Self‐Efficacy Scale, N = 167, mean (SD) 2.8 (0.4) 3.3 (0.4) 3.2 (0.5) <.001a
Education at upper secondary school level prior to entering the BSN Programme, N = 165, (3‐year theoretical programme Natural Science/3‐year theoretical programme Social Science/3‐year programme Nursing Care/Other programme) 8/14/3/9 9/32/8/19 9/22/14/18 .384b
Higher Education before the nursing programme, N = 167, yes/no 17/18 22/46 22/42 .243b
Work experience in healthcare prior to entering the BSN Programme, N = 170, yes/no 19/17 34/35 39/26 .453b
Paid work experience in healthcare when studying the BSN Programme, N = 169, yes/no 32/4 48/20 57/8 .017b
Recommend the BSN programme to others, N = 168 (no/likely/definitely) 13/19/4 9/29/30 7/32/25 .001b
Overall Quality of the BSN Programmed, N = 167, Md (Q1;Q3) 2 (2;3) 3 (3;3) 3 (3;3) <.001c

Mean, median (Md), standard deviations (SD) and quartiles (Q1, Q3).

a

One‐way ANOVA.

b

Chi‐square test.

c

Kruskal–Wallis test.

d

Response alternatives were 1 = very low, 2 = low, 3 = high and 4 = very high.