Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 1;48(1):43–52. doi: 10.1002/dc.24328

Table 3.

Frequency of patients with nodules harboring multiple coexisting strong and/or weak drivers among patients with nodules harboring mutations and fusions that underwent focused (N = 931, green) or expanded (N = 1152, blue) mutation panel testing [Color table can be viewed at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com]

Focused panel N = 931 (N%) Expanded panel N = 1135 (N%)
Coexisting strong drivers
BRAF(V600E), TERT NA 1.1% (12)
Coexisting strong and weak drivers
BRAFV600E, BRAF X* 0.1% (1) 0%
BRAFV600E, RAS 0.5% (5) 0%
BRAFV600E, PIK3CA 0% 0.1% (1)
TERT, PIK3CA NA 0.1% (1)
TERT, RAS NA 3.2% (36)
TERT, BRAF X* NA 0.1% (1)
RET, RAS NA 0.1% (1)
Coexisting weak drivers
RAS, PPARG fusion 0.1% (1) 0%
PIK3CA, RAS 0.2% (2) 0.2% (2)
PTEN, RAS NA 0.1% (1)
PTEN, GNAS NA 0.2% (2)
Total coexisting drivers 1% (9) 5% (57)
P value P < .001

Notes: NA, not applicable as both mutations were not tested for in focused panel; BRAF X*, mutations in BRAF other than BRAFV600E.