Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 10;72(1):78–87. doi: 10.1002/acr.23839

Table 4.

Treatment in all included patients with juvenile Sjögren's syndromea

No. SGUS– SGUS+ P b Benjamin‐Hochberg adjustment
Symptomatic treatment, current 29/59 (49)c 17/25 (68) 16/34 (47) 0.109 NS
Symptomatic treatment, ever 47/59 (80)d 22/25 (88) 25/34 (74) 0.172 NS
Salivary substitutes, current 4/59 (7) 1/25 (4) 3/34 (9) 0.466 NS
Salivary substitutes, ever 5/59 (8) 1/25 (4) 4/34 (12) 0.466 NS
Lacrimal substitutes, current 25/59 (42)e 16/25 (64) 9/34 (26) 0.004 Significant
Lacrimal substitutes, ever 30/59 (51)e 18/25 (72) 12/34 (35) 0.005 Significant
NSAIDS, current 9/59 (15) 1/25 (4) 8/34 (24) 0.039 NS
NSAIDs, ever 25/59 (42)f 9/25 (36) 16/34 (47) 0.396 NS
Systemic treatment, ever 56/59 (95)g 25/25 (100) 31/34 (91) 0.127 NS
Systemic treatment, current 46/59 (78)h 23/25 (92) 23/34 (68) 0.026 NS
Hydroxychloroquine, ever 54/59 (92)g 25/25 (100) 29/34 (85) 0.045 NS
Hydroxychloroquine, current 40/59 (68)g 22/25 (88) 18/34 (53) 0.004 Significant
MTX, ever 22/57 (39)f 9/25 (36) 13/32 (41) 0.722 NS
MTX, current 14/57 (25)f 6/25 (24) 8/32 (25) 0.931 NS
Azathioprine, ever 12/58 (21)i 6/25 (24) 6/33 (18) 0.588 NS
Azathioprine, current 10/58 (17)j 5/25 (20) 5/33 (15) 0.628 NS
Low prednisone, ever 31/57 (54)d 11/24 (46) 20/33 (61) 0.269 NS
Low prednisone, current 12/57 (21)k 4/24 (17) 8/33 (24) 0.489 NS
High prednisone, ever 13/59 (22)c 6/25 (24) 7/34 (21) 0.755 NS
High prednisone, current 5/59 (8)j 2/25 (8) 3/34 (9) 0.911 NS
a

Values are the number of patients with positive findings/patients with available information (%), unless indicated otherwise. Regional differences refer to patients included in Brazil compared to patients included in Europe/US. SGUS = salivary gland ultrasonography; NS = nonsignificant; NSAIDs = nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs; MTX = methotrexate.

b

P values are for the comparison of SGUS+ and SGUS– patients.

c

Six patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)/mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD), with regional differences.

d

Six patients with SLE/MCTD.

e

Five patients with SLE/MCTD, with regional differences.

f

One patient with SLE/MCTD.

g

Eight patients with SLE/MCTD.

h

Eight patients with SLE/MCTD, with regional differences.

i

Four patients with SLE/MCTD, with regional differences.

j

Four patients with SLE/MCTD.

k

Five patients with SLE/MCTD.