Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 22;124(2):288–298. doi: 10.1038/s41437-019-0279-y

Table 2.

Information about the 20 simulated QTNs

QTN Chr Position (bp) Effect Proportiona (%) MSE
1 2 25128989 0.066859 0.7665 0.1376
2 3 18849505 0.645265 7.3985 0.4144
3 3 47643448 −0.01178 0.135 0.3855
4 5 88624357 0.083782 0.9605 0.2591
5 5 98951148 −0.1257 1.4415 0.4605
6 6 11888618 −0.10072 1.155 0.3903
7 6 28262330 0.22537 2.584 0.3721
8 7 39373442 0.261224 2.995 0.2649
9 7 103925447 −0.45702 5.24 0.4617
10 8 44609878 −0.34945 4.007 0.2344
11 9 7918734 0.031867 0.3655 0.3695
12 9 78871984 −0.11516 1.3205 0.5181
13 9 102649062 0.249944 2.866 0.3014
14 13 21139804 0.283293 3.2485 0.1847
15 14 8615666 0.271053 3.108 0.2635
16 15 37134429 0.123874 1.4205 0.3743
17 16 44300159 0.428834 4.917 0.2741
18 22 4643997 0.138882 1.5925 0.3742
19 24 53584633 −0.09543 1.094 0.4344
20 29 6770481 −0.29518 3.3845 0.2813

aProportion of the phenotypic variance contributed by each individual QTN