Table 5.
Group | Enantiomeric proportion | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | AUC | 95% CI | p-value | Cut-off |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Control vs. MCI | D-Pro, %D | 57 | 87 | 0.71 | 0.639–0.789 | <0.001 | 0.41 |
D-Ser, %D | 58 | 57 | 0.60 | 0.519–0.681 | 0.016 | 0.91 | |
D-Ala, %D | 68 | 55 | 0.67 | 0.589–0.743 | <0.001 | 0.31 | |
D-Pro × D-Ser, %D2 | 70 | 84 | 0.80 | 0.723–0.877 | <0.001 | 0.30 | |
D-Pro × D-Ala, %D2 | 74 | 58 | 0.72 | 0.642–0.792 | <0.001 | 0.10 | |
D-Ser × D-Ala, %D2 | 68 | 58 | 0.67 | 0.598–0.752 | <0.001 | 0.26 | |
D-Pro × D-Ser × D-Ala, %D3 | 65 | 68 | 0.73 | 0.653–0.802 | <0.001 | 0.10 | |
D-Pro × D-Ser/D-Ala, %D | 57 | 53 | 0.55 | 0.465–0.637 | 0.246 | 0.82 | |
Control vs. Dementia | D-Pro, %D | 67 | 87 | 0.72 | 0.457–0.987 | 0.100 | 0.45 |
D-Ser, %D | 83 | 58 | 0.67 | 0.381–0.955 | 0.251 | 0.94 | |
D-Ala, %D | 67 | 68 | 0.68 | 0.429–0.924 | 0.163 | 0.41 | |
D-Pro × D-Ser, %D2 | 67 | 90 | 0.73 | 0.448–1.003 | 0.112 | 0.50 | |
D-Pro × D-Ala, %D2 | 83 | 80 | 0.77 | 0.543–0.996 | 0.020 | 0.16 | |
D-Ser × D-Ala, %D2 | 83 | 78 | 0.73 | 0.471–0.995 | 0.080 | 0.45 | |
D-Pro × D-Ser × D-Ala, %D3 | 83 | 80 | 0.80 | 0.553–1.042 | 0.026 | 0.15 | |
D-Pro × D-Ser/D-Ala, %D | 67 | 68 | 0.62 | 0.361–0.878 | 0.365 | 1.19 |
Selected participants: Control (N = 60, MMSE: 30), MCI (N = 149, MMSE: 26–21), Dementia (N = 6, MMSE: 20–0).