Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 21;11:417. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-14016-1

Table 1.

Reaction optimizationa.

graphic file with name 41467_2019_14016_Figa_HTML.gif
Entry Deviation from standard conditions Yield, % 3a:4a
1 No 89 (82)b 27:1
2 No Et3SiH 6 4:1
3 Zn instead of Et3SiH 35 12:1
4 ZnMe2, MeMgBr instead of Et3SiH Trace
5 KF, Na2CO3, Cs2CO3, NaOH instead of LiOH Trace
6 No TBAB 8 2:1
7 NiCl2 instead of NiI2 Trace
8 NiBr2 instead of NiI2 46 21:1
9 Ni(COD)2, no Et3SiH 12 2:1
10 L1 28 2:1
11 L2 81 51:1
12 L3 78 35:1
13 L4 76 1:77
14 NiI2/BC (5 mol%) 72 19:1
15 60 °C, 24 h 71 8:1
16 60 °C, no Et3SiH 10 6:1

aStandard conditions: NiI2 (15.6 mg, 0.05 mmol, 10 mol%), BC (18.0 mg, 0.05 mmol, 10 mol%), Et3SiH (20 μL, 0.13 mmol, 25 mol%), 1a (145.0 mg, 0.5 mmol, 1.0 equiv), 2a (127.5 mg, 0.75 mmol, 1.5 equiv), LiOH (29.9 mg, 1.25 mmol, 2.5 equiv), TBAB (161.2 mg, 0.5 mmol, 1.0 equiv), DMA (4 mL). Yields were determined by GC with 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene as the internal standard

bIsolated yield

graphic file with name 41467_2019_14016_Figb_HTML.gif