Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 9;105(1):96–107. doi: 10.1113/EP088166

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Mean salivary flow rate was significantly higher whilst capsaicin was held in the mouth. Flow rate differences in the 2 min post‐stimulation were not statistically significant (paired t test, n = 10). Data are shown as means ± SD. Note, the error bar spanning zero for the control solution results from a ‘negative’ flow rate in some participants, indicative of a net fluid loss following the rinse, due to coating of liquid onto oral tissues