Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 7;2020:1520747. doi: 10.1155/2020/1520747

Table 3.

Results of metaregression analysis.

Coef. 95% CI t value P value
Continuous variable
 Publication year 0.053 (-0.219, 0.113) -0.69 0.501
 Study length 0.005 (-0.128, 0.137) 0.08 0.937
 Age of mice 0.290 (-0.792, 0.213) -1.25 0.234
Binary variable
 Source of curcumin 1.026 (-2.361, 0.310) -1.67 0.120
 Gender of mice 0.519 (-1.154, 2.192) 0.68 0.512
 Staining methods 0.545 (-1.817, 1.009) -0.62 0.545
Multicategorical variable
Assessing location Arch 0.717 (-2.818, 1.384) -0.76 0.465 0.7276
Sinus 0.695 (-2.770, 1.379) -0.75 0.472
Whole 0.513 (-1.449, 2.475) 0.58 0.573
Route of curcumin Chow 0.527 (-1.165, 2.220) 0.69 0.507 0.1776
Intravenous injection 0.758 (-1.443, 2.959) 0.76 0.464

Coef.: coefficient; CI: confidence interval; Dummy variable was applied for metaregression analysis of multicategorical variable. The former P value in metaregression analysis of multicategorical variable represents the comparison of each variable with the control variable (thoracic aorta or oral gavage). The latter P value represents a total statistical difference of assessing location area or route of curcumin. P < 0.05 was considered to be of statistical difference.