Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 18;50(11):3814–3830. doi: 10.1111/ejn.14508

Table 3.

Summary table reporting the results of the ANOVAs computed on the rating given by participants to the first statement and to the average of statements 2–5 of the DMI questionnaire in Experiment 5. Significant results are presented in bold

  Experiment 5: Macrogeometric modulations
Source of variation df Effect size (ηp 2) F Test p level

Statement 1

‘I felt as if I was touching my teeth with my right index finger’

Stroking 1 0.815 30.903 .001
Macrogeometry 1 0.513 7.365 .030
Stroking × Macrogeometry 1 0.328 3.424 .107

Statements 2–5

Averaged rating

Stroking 1 0.096 0.740 .418
Macrogeometry 1 0.658 13.462 .008
Stroking × Macrogeometry 1 0.605 10.704 .014