Rating*	Multiplier	Max Points
Format & Content
Original, synthetic, thoughtful work	0–5	2.5	12.5
Scientific information was accurate	0–5	2.5	12.5
Significance, take home message(s), big ideas, and/or general principles highlighted	0–5	2	10
Information was appropriate/relevant	0–5	2	10
Activity encouraged participants to retrieve information in a low-stakes fashion	0–5	2	10
Two or more deployed: interleaving, elaboration, dual coding, concrete examples	0–5	2	10
Reflection
Reflection (Appendix 2) completed within 48 hours of presentation	0–5	2.5	12.5
Reflection (Appendix 2) completed with thought/care/specifics	0–5	2.5	12.5
Logistics
Shareable resource created	0–5	1	5
Sharable resource provided to instructor before class	0–5	1	5
Total			100

^*5 = Excellent (complete and exceptional or flawless work)

^*4 = Very Good (strong, complete work; minor improvements possible)

^*3 = Good (acceptable, complete work; minor/moderate improvements needed)

^*2 = Fair (work that meets minimal requirements; moderate improvements needed)

^*1 = Poor (weak and/or incomplete work that does not meet minimal requirements; significant Improvements needed

^*0 = Absent (work that was not attempted/completed/submitted)