Skip to main content
. 2019 May 23;11(1):51–62. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2019.1611153

Table 2.

Summary of survey responses by willingness to become a stool donor.

    Highly willing to be a stool donor
 
  Median survey response and interquartile range (Likert scale of 1–10) No (n = 330) Yes (n = 448) P value
Attitude toward FMT        
Previous knowledge about FMT and how it could help patients 8.0 (4.0–9.0) 7.0 (2.0–9.0) 8.0 (5.0–10.0) <0.001
Positive attitude toward FMT 9.0 (8.0–10.0) 8.0 (6.0–9.0) 10.0 (8.0–10.0) <0.001
Collection of my own stool is unpleasant 5.0 (3.0–8.0) 7.0 (5.0–8.0) 4.0 (2.0–7.0) <0.001
Time commitment        
Having to see a doctor to review my medical history and undergo a physical examination is invasive 2.0 (1.0–4.0) 3.0 (2.0–5.0) 2.0 (1.0–4.0) <0.001
Having to do blood/stool tests every 4 months is a reasonable commitment 7.0 (5.0–8.0) 6.0 (5.0–8.0) 8.0 (6.0–9.0) <0.001
Becoming a stool donor would be a large commitment for me to make if I have to        
Donate twice a week 8.0 (6.0–10.0) 9.0 (7.0–10.0) 8.0 (6.0–9.0) <0.001
Donate once a week 7.0 (5.0–9.0) 7.0 (6.0–9.0) 6.0 (4.0–8.0) <0.001
Donate every 2 weeks 5.0 (3.0–7.0) 6.0 (4.0–8.0) 4.0 (2.0–6.0) <0.001
Donate every month 3.0 (1.0–5.0) 4.0 (3.0–6.0) 2.0 (1.0–4.0) <0.001
Economic compensation        
Economic compensation is fair to blood donors 5.0 (2.0–7.0) 5.0 (3.0–7.0) 5.0 (2.0–7.0) 0.038
Economic compensation is fair to stool donors 5.0 (3.0–7.0) 5.0 (3.0–7.0) 5.0 (2.0–7.0) 0.013
More likely to become a stool donor if economic compensation is offered 7.0 (3.0–9.0) 7.0 (4.0–8.0) 7.0 (3.0–9.0) 0.92
Would consider being a stool donor        
If there is no economic compensation 6.0 (5.0–8.0) 5.0 (4.0–6.0) 7.0 (6.0–9.0) <0.001
For $5–10 per donation 5.0 (3.0–7.0) 5.0 (2.0–6.0) 6.0 (4.0–8.0) <0.001
For $10.01–20 per donation 6.0 (4.0–8.0) 5.0 (3.0–7.0) 7.0 (5.0–9.0) <0.001
For $20.01–30 per donation 7.0 (5.0–9.0) 7.0 (4.0–8.0) 8.0 (5.0–10.0) <0.001
For $40 per donation 8.5 (5.0–10.0) 8.0 (5.0–10.0) 9.0 (6.0–10.0) <0.001
Opinion in terms of a fair amount for each stool donation Number of participants (total n = 778)     <0.001
$0 178 (28.1%) 60 (21.8%) 118 (33.0%)  
$1–10 91 (14.4%) 27 (9.8%) 64 (17.9%)  
$11–20 136 (21.5%) 52 (18.9%) 84 (23.5%)  
$21–30 85 (13.4%) 45 (16.4%) 40 (11.2%)  
$31–40 84 (13.3%) 53 (19.3%) 31 (8.7%)  
$40+ 59 (9.3%) 38 (13.8%) 21 (5.9%)  
Motivations for donating        
Primary reason for stool donation if choosing to become a donor Number of participants (total n = 778)     <0.001
Purely altruistic 323 (41.6%) 103 (31.3%) 220 (49.1%)  
Mostly altruistic, but also economic 272 (35.0%) 120 (36.5%) 152 (33.9%)  
Equally altruistic and economic 133 (17.1%) 77 (23.4%) 56 (12.5%)  
Mostly economic, but also altruistic 40 (5.1%) 23 (7.0%) 17 (3.8%)  
Purely economic 9 (1.2%) 6 (1.8%) 3 (0.7%)  
  Median survey response and interquartile range (Likert scale of 1–10)      
Helping others is more important to me than any inconvenience being a stool donor may impose 7.0 (5.0–9.0) 6.0 (5.0–7.0) 8.0 (6.0–9.0) <0.001
Would like to know how my donations are helping patients requiring FMT 8.0 (7.0–10.0) 8.0 (6.0–9.0) 9.0 (7.0–10.0) <0.001
Donor status        
Would be willing to receive FMT if becoming sick 9.0 (7.0–10.0) 7.0 (5.0–9.0) 10.0 (8.0–10.0) <0.001