Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 6;1:16. Originally published 2018 May 14. [Version 2] doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.12837.2

Table 1. Review inclusion criteria using the PICOS framework.

Participants Men without a diagnosis of a testicular disorder
Interventions Educational/health promotion intervention/programme
Comparisons The effect of intervention compared to baseline and/or control conditions i.e. alternative intervention(s)
or no intervention
Outcomes
(primary)
  (i)  Knowledge and awareness of testicular disorders and/or self-examination
 (ii)  Behaviours and/or intentions to examine/feel own testes
(iii)  Help-seeking behaviours and/or intentions for testicular symptoms
Study design Any experimental design (i.e. randomised controlled trial, non-randomised controlled trial, pre-post
study design with one or more groups, and post-test only study design with one or more groups) and
structured reviews of interventions (i.e. systematic and integrative reviews)