Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 19;14(1):95–113. doi: 10.1007/s11571-019-09548-7

Table 6.

Performance of cross-conditional classification of local features in sensor and source space using the framework explained in “Temporal evolution of internal mental states” section

Classifier Feature Classification performance (%)
Necker cube (NC) Stroboscopic alternative motion (SAM) Structure from motion (SFM)
Accuracy Sensitivity Specificity Accuracy Sensitivity Specificity Accuracy Sensitivity Specificity
SVM Sensor Training 75.32 75.43 75.30 76.24 83.77 74.67
Source Training 70.44 76.10 69.64 72.24 85.71 69.42
Sensor 67.94 66.03 68.21 Training 68.87 74.10 68.45
Source 67.87 63.51 68.49 Training 69.22 75.54 68.71
Sensor 72.44 72.05 72.50 72.69 73.03 72.67 Training
Source 70.78 63.64 71.80 71.69 71.96 71.68 Training
ANN Sensor Training 75.02 73.56 75.22 75.57 80.74 74.49
Source Training 70.84 72.50 70.61 71.70 79.08 70.16
Sensor 70.07 71.65 69.85 Training 70.67 79.15 69.98
Source 62.28 65.06 61.88 Training 63.03 73.67 62.17
Sensor 72.95 71.52 73.15 73.13 71.70 73.19 Training
Source 64.80 66.48 64.56 65.03 74.10 64.62 Training