Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 21;15(1):e0227712. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227712

Table 3. Attitude towards ADR reporting practices among doctors in Addis Ababa, 2017 (n = 407).

Variables n(%)
SA* Agree Undecided Disagree SD*
ADR reporting is duty of health professionals 142 (34.9) 246 (60.4) 12 (2.9) 6 (1.5) 1(0.2)
ADRs need to be sure before reporting 109(26.8) 272(66.8) 22(5.4) 4(1.0) 0(0)
ADR report improves patient’s safety 130(31.9) 261(64.1) 16(3.9) 0(0) 0(0)
All suspected ADRs should be reported 68(16.7) 195(47.9) 52(12.8) 83(20.4) 9(2.2)
ADR reporting trends identify relatively safe drugs 76(18.7) 252(61.9) 53(13.0) 20(4.9) 6(1.5)
ADR reporting creates workload 4(1.0) 51(12.5) 63(15.5) 211(51.8) 78(19.2)
ADR reporting is not important for healthcare system 2(0.5) 14(3.4) 29(7.1) 229(56.3) 133(32.7)
Reporting of ADR affects patient’s confidentiality issues 5(1.2) 30(7.4) 136(33.4) 179(44.0) 57(14.0)
A single ADR report brings no difference 3(0.7) 42(10.3) 77(18.9) 170(41.8) 115(28.3)
Fear of legal liability affects ADR reporting 17(4.2) 192(47.2) 128(31.4) 61(15.0) 9(2.2)

* SA represent as “strongly agree” and SD as “strongly disagree”