Table 5.
Comparison with some existing methods for SZ/HC classification.
Methods | ACC (%) | SEN (%) | SPE (%) | AUC |
---|---|---|---|---|
Huang et al. (2018) | 77.24 | 77.46 | 76.58 | 0.815 |
Cheng et al. (2015) | 74.48 | 73.53 | 69.12 | 0.792 |
Proposed | 93.10 | 92.96 | 93.24 | 0.950 |
Bold text indicates that the best result is obtained on a certain evaluation metric.