Table 3.
h2res | h2cis | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Predictor | Estimate | P-value | r-squared | Estimate | P-value | r-squared |
Median Read count | 5.21 × 10−2 | 6.81 × 10−276 | 1.16 × 10−1 | −3.76 × 10−3 | 2.15 × 10−2 | 8.16 × 10−4 |
NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
GC content | 3.10 × 10−3 | 1.80 × 10−115 | 4.81 × 10−2 | 1.58 × 10−3 | 4.02 × 10−26 | 8.85 × 10−3 |
GC contenta | 2.27 × 10−3 | 1.07 × 10−69 | 2.83 × 10−2 | 1.64 × 10−3 | 6.11 × 10−28 | 9.85 × 10−3 |
LOF score | 7.24 × 10−3 | 8.16 × 10−18 | 3.14 × 10−2 | −3.19 × 10−3 | 8.52 × 10−5 | 2.55 × 10−3 |
LOF scorea | −1.65 × 10−4 | 8.04 × 10−1 | 3.95 × 10−6 | 6.10 × 10−4 | 4.08 × 10−1 | 6.18 × 10−5 |
pLI score | 3.54 × 10−2 | 7.09 × 10−19 | 2.47 × 10−2 | −2.37 × 10−2 | 1.27 × 10−9 | 7.41 × 10−3 |
pLI scorea | −1.73 × 10−3 | 5.98 × 10−1 | 1.50 × 10−5 | −3.00 × 10−3 | 4.13 × 10−1 | 1.29 × 10−4 |
pNull | −4.59 × 10−2 | 2.86 × 10−17 | 2.54 × 10−2 | 1.72 × 10−2 | 6.30 × 10−4 | 1.90 × 10−3 |
pNulla | −4.31 × 10−3 | 2.99 × 10−1 | 7.50 × 10−5 | −3.54 × 10−3 | 4.45 × 10−1 | 7.75 × 10−5 |
pRec | −1.30 × 10−2 | 3.25 × 10−3 | 1.43 × 10−3 | 1.58 × 10−2 | 1.96 × 10−4 | 3.34 × 10−3 |
pReca | −1.64 × 10−3 | 6.50 × 10−1 | 5.74 × 10−5 | 7.37 × 10−3 | 6.62 × 10−2 | 4.33 × 10−4 |
Gene length | 1.80 × 10−8 | 8.10 × 10−2 | 2.12 × 10−4 | 9.54 × 10−9 | 3.86 × 10−1 | 2.30 × 10−4 |
Gene lengtha | 4.94 × 10−8 | 4.13 × 10−7 | 2.26 × 10−3 | 7.48 × 10−9 | 4.96 × 10−1 | 1.59 × 10−4 |
We tested whether h2 could be predicted by gene expression level, gene length, GC content or several loss-of-function scores obtained from Lek et al. [22]
LOF loss-of-function, PLI probability of loss-of-function, pNull completely tolerant of loss-of-function, pRec intolerant of two loss-of-function variants
ah2 corrected for median read count