. 2020 Jan 21;6(1):e03122. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e03122

Table 1.

Comparison of specific capacitance and cyclic stability of PPy-based electrodes.

Material	Electrolyte	Potential window (V)	Capacity (F g-1)	Current density	Capacity retention (%)	Ref.
PPy paper electrode	1 M HCL	0.0–0.8	370	1 mAcm⁻¹	75.6% after cycling for 10000 times	[25]
PPy/Ni	1 M H₂SO₄	-0.2–0.8	488	250 mAg^-1	56% after 1000 cycles	[37]
AgNWs/PPy	1 M KOH	0.0–0.5	509	0.31 Ag^-1	90% after 10000 cycles	[11]
MnO₂/PPy	0.1M Ca(NO₃)2$4HO	0.0–1.0	290	0.5 Ag^-1	90% after 3000 cycles	[53]
PPyNF/NiOx	6 M KOH	0.0–0.5	657	0.5 Ag^-1	80% after 1000 cycles	[54]
PPy/MoO₃	1M H₂SO₄	-0.2–0.8	687	1 Ag^-1	83% after 3000 cycles	[52]
PPy/PbOx	PVA- H₂SO₄	0.0–1.2	377	2.0 Ag⁻¹	94% after 5000 cycles	[55]
PPyNT/CoOx	1.0 M H₂SO₄	-0.2–0.8	270	1 Ag^-1	100% after 1000 cycles	[56]
PPy	1 M KOH	0.0–0.6	773.6	1 Ag^-1	77.6%after 1000 cycles	[51]
e-PPy	PVA/H₃PO₄	0.0–0.6	170	3 Ag^-1	80.4% after 130000	[31]
CC@PPy	PVA- H₂SO₄	-0.2–0.8	705	1 Ag^-1	58.3% after 5000 cycles	This work