Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 12;40:100735. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2019.100735

Table 3.

Regression results predicting math fluency gains for younger and older children. Results of the regression analyses performed to study the role of temporal and frontal cortex activation during phonological processing (entered in step 2) in predicting gains in math fluency, over and above the cognitive skills entered in step 1.

Predicting gains in math fluency
Younger children
Step Predictor Stand. β t p R2 ΔR2 F ΔF p ΔF
1 Math fluency at T1 -.369 −1.555 .137 .179 .179 .786 .786 .573
Reading at T1 -.275 -.794 .438
Verbal STM at T1 .259 .933 .363
Verbal WM at T1 .009 .030 .976
Verbal IQ at T1 .133 .350 .731
2 Math fluency at T1 -.322 −1.537 .144 .442 .263 1.811 3.771 .046
Reading at T1 -.154 -.477 .640
Verbal STM at T1 .438 1.688 .111
Verbal WM at T1 .219 .824 .422
Verbal IQ at T1 -.157 -.446 .662
Frontal activation T1 -.692 −2.120 .050
Temporal activation T1 .898 2.745 .014
Predicting gains in math fluency
Older children
Step Predictor Stand. β t p R2 ΔR2 F ΔF ΔF
1 Math fluency at T1 .078 .373 .713 .277 .277 1.377 1.377 .279
Reading at T1 .375 1.248 .228
Verbal STM at T1 .222 .902 .379
Verbal WM at T1 -.189 -.769 .452
Verbal IQ at T1 .111 .391 .700
2 Math fluency at T1 .088 .416 .683 .380 .103 1.398 1.327 .293
Reading at T1 .382 1.277 .220
Verbal STM at T1 .251 1.036 .315
Verbal WM at T1 -.254 -.927 .368
Verbal IQ at T1 .018 .063 .951
Frontal activation T1 -.286 -.994 .335
Temporal activation T1 -.088 -.324 .750

Note. ΔR2: change in R2. ΔF: Change in F. No multicollinearity was found in these analyses, with the VIF values ranging from 1.23 to 3.57 for the regression analysis with younger children and from 1.09 to 2.30 for the regression analysis with older children.