Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 22;20:69. doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-4794-5

Table 4.

Analysis identifying qualitative variables that differed significantly between the good and unfavorable outcome groups

Qualitative variables Good (n = 35) Unfavorable (n = 41) P-value
Gender (male) 23 27 0.990
Am B administration 33 36 0.565
Shunt surgery 2 9 0.045
Headache 34 37 0.456
Fever 23 25 0.669
Vomiting 19 19 0.490
Impaired consciousness 1 14 0.001
Visual disturbance 5 10 0.270
Seizures 1 8 0.065
Limb weakness 3 4 1.000
Altered mentation 2 5 0.565
Hearing impairment 1 1 0.910
CSF Opening pressure(>300mmH2O) 13 25 0.038
Meningeal irritation positive 17 28 0.081
India ink test and culture positive 15 11 0.142
Dilated VRS 23 27 0.990
Parenchymal lesions 19 22 0.956
Meningeal enhancement 6 10 0.440
Hydrocephalus 2 9 0.045
Gelatinous pseudocyst 3 4 1.000

Pearson’s χ2 continuity correction of Fisher’s exact test was used for statistical analysis; CSF Cerebrospinal fluid