Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov;40(11):1924–1931. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6252

Table 2:

Radiologic and clinical outcomes of patients in the 4 different treatment technique groupsa

Variables Observation (n = 6) SACE (n = 9) PAO (n = 6) FD (n = 7) P Value
Follow-up (mo) 28.3±14.2 27 ± 23.4 40.2 ± 37.4 16.3 ± 13.1 .37b
Initial aneurysm size (mm) 17.8 ± 5.5 11.7 ± 2.2 20.3 ± 8.4 22.5 ± 7.7 .01b
Aneurysm size on follow-up (mm) 23.4 ± 9.8 13.9 ± 5.2 14.4 ± 9.7 19.9 ± 10.1 .1b
Change of aneurysm size (%) 129.3 ± 29.5 117.8 ± 30.0 73.2 ± 32.2 85.9 ± 28.7 .008b
Retreatment 4 (66.7) 3 (33.3) 0 (0) 0 (0) .017c
    SACE 0 (0) 1 (33.3) 0 (0) 0 (0)
    PAO 1 (25) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
    FD 3 (75) 2 (66.6) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Initial ischemic stroke 0 (0) 1 (11.1) 1 (16.7) 1 (14.3) .79c
Ischemic stroke on follow-up 1 (16.7) 1 (11.1) 1 (16.7) 0 (0) .73c
Subarachnoid hemorrhage on follow-up 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Improvement of mRS score 0 (0) 0 (0) 4 (66.7) 6 (85.7) <.001c
Worsening of mRS score 4 (66.7) 3 (33.3) 2 (33.3) 0 (0) .086c
a

Values are presented as mean ± SD or number (%).

b

ANOVA test.

c

Fisher exact test.