Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec;40(12):2033–2038. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6303

Fig 1.

Fig 1.

Comparative illustration of the distribution of ASPECTS from consensus reads of 2 neuroradiologists, software-based automated ASPECTS, and CTP-CBV for all patients in our study population (each marker represents a patient’s score). Automated ASPECTS showed excellent agreement (κ = 0.84; 95% CI, 0.62–1.0) with both consensus and CTP-CBV ASPECTS. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.76–0.90) across all 3 groups.