Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 22;15(1):e0227051. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227051

Table 5. Adjusted analysis of maximum likelihood and odds ratio estimates for cyberbullying victimization among students in the past 12 months (N = 412) [Model I].

Maximum likelihood estimates OR estimates
Parameter df Estimate(B) SE Wald χ2 P value Parame-ter AOR 95% CI
Age [completed years] (mean = 2.67, SD = 1.22)
>21 1 0.18 0.28 0.44 0.510 vs. ≤21 1.20 0.70–2.06
Sex
Female 1 0.25 0.23 1.21 0.270 vs. Male 1.29 0.82–2.02
Marital status
Married 1 0.15 0.45 0.11 0.740 vs. Single 1.16 0.48–2.83
Total year(s) of study (mean = 2.67, SD = 1.22)
≤3 1 0.59 0.23 6.42 0.011 vs. >3 1.81 1.14–2.85
Residence
Other 1 0.33 0.27 1.52 0.218 vs. Magway 1.39 0.82–2.34
Facebook usage
Yes 1 0.62 0.95 0.43 0.514 vs. No 1.86 0.29–11.91
Other social media usage§
Yes 1 0.19 0.22 0.73 0.392 vs. No 1.21 0.79–1.86
Average hour(s) per day spent on social media (mean = 2.88, SD = 1.83)
1 to 2 1 -0.27 0.31 0.74 0.391 vs. ≤1 0.77 0.41–1.41
>2 1 -0.30 0.29 0.01 0.918 vs. ≤1 0.97 0.55–1.70
Witnessed psychological, physical or sexual violence, or cyberbullying
Yes 1 1.08 0.35 9.35 0.002 vs. No 2.95 1.48–5.91

§Other social media usage: usage of Instagram or YouTube or Viber or WeChat or Bee Talk or Twitter

Model I adjusted for age, sex, marital status, total year(s) of study, residence, Facebook usage, other social media usage, average hour(s) per day spent on social media, and witnessing psychological, physical or sexual violence, or cyberbullying in their neighborhoods.