Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2020 Jan 22;15(1):e0227838. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227838

Effect of prednisolone on glyoxalase 1 in an inbred mouse model of aristolochic acid nephropathy using a proteomics method with fluorogenic derivatization-liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

Shih‐Ming Chen 1,¤,*, Chia‐En Lin 1,¤, Hung-Hsiang Chen 1,¤, Yu-Fan Cheng 1,¤, Hui-Wen Cheng 1,¤, Kazuhiro Imai 2
Editor: Fabio Sallustio3
PMCID: PMC6975546  PMID: 31968011

Abstract

Prednisolone is involved in glucose homeostasis and has been used for treatment for aristolochic acid (AA) nephropathy (AAN), but its effect on glycolysis in kidney has not yet been clarified. This study aims to investigate the effect in terms of altered proteins after prednisolone treatment in a mice model of AAN using a proteomics technique. The six-week C3H/He female mice were administrated AA (0.5 mg/kg/day) for 56 days. AA+P group mice were then given prednisolone (2 mg/kg/day) via oral gavage for the next 14 days, and AA group mice were fed water instead. The tubulointerstitial damage was improved after prednisolone treatment comparing to that of AA group. Kidney homogenates were harvested to perform the proteomics analysis with fluorogenic derivatization-liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method (FD-LC-MS/MS). On the other hand, urinary methylglyoxal and D-lactate levels were determined by high performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection. There were 47 altered peaks and 39 corresponding proteins on day 14 among the groups, and the glycolysis-related proteins, especially glyoxalase 1 (GLO1), fructose-bisphosphate aldolase B (aldolase B), and triosephosphate isomerase (TPI), decreased in the AA+P group. Meanwhile, prednisolone decreased the urinary amount of methylglyoxal (AA+P: 2.004 ± 0.301 μg vs. AA: 2.741 ± 0.630 μg, p < 0.05), which was accompanied with decrease in urinary amount of D-lactate (AA+P: 54.07 ± 5.45 μmol vs. AA: 86.09 ± 8.44 μmol, p < 0.05). Prednisolone thus alleviated inflammation and interstitial renal fibrosis. The renal protective mechanism might be associated with down-regulation of GLO1 via reducing the contents of methylglyoxal derived from glycolysis. With the aid of proteomics analysis and the determination of methylglyoxal and its metabolite-D-lactate, we have demonstrated for the first time the biochemical efficacy of prednisolone, and urinary methylglyoxal and its metabolite-D-lactate might be potential biomarkers for AAN.

Introduction

Aristolochic acid nephropathy (AAN) was first introduced in 1993 [1]. After the Belgian women ingested slimming pills containing aristolochic acid (AA), their renal function dramatically decreased and managed by dialysis. The feature of AAN is rapid progression into interstitial renal fibrosis and end-stage renal disease [1, 2]. AA is extracted from the Aristolochiaceae species and was used for anti-inflammatory activities in traditional medicine. AA is a mixture of 8-methoxy-6-nitrophenanthro-(3,4-D)-1,3-dioxolo-5-carboxylic acid (aristolochic acid I [AAI]) and its 8-demethoxylated form (aristolochic acid II [AAII]) [3]. AAI shows stronger nephrotoxicity than AAII in AAN because of the O-methoxy group at position C-8 of the nitrophenanthrene ring [4]. This structure of AAI facilitates AA interactions with DNA, and this AA-DNA adduct leads to cytotoxicity and carcinogenicity. A recent study indicates that AA-induced upper tract urothelial cancer is related to p38 and extracellular signal regulated kinases (ERK) sub-pathways [5]. Despite prohibition of AA-containing herbs, patients are still suffering from AAN [6]. Vanherweghem et al. successfully treated AAN with prednisolone, because AAN is thought to be related to the immune response, such as infiltration of immune cells into the renal cortex [7]. Recently, Ma et al. showed that low-dose prednisone (0.5 mg/kg) is effective at slowing the progression of AAN via the suppression of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) and transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) activities [8].

Prednisolone, one of the glucocorticoids, acts as endogenous cortisol that is released from the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, particularly in the case of stress or injury [9]. Prednisolone fights inflammation via the regulation of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-1 (IL-1), and interleukin-6 (IL-6) etc, thus, widely applied to treating various inflammation diseases or states, such as allergies, asthma, dermatitis, rheumatic disorders, systemic lupus erythematosus, and autoimmune disorders[1012]. Recently, Baudoux et al. demonstrated that cluster of differentiation CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells regulate immune responses in AA-induced acute tubular necrosis [13]. However, the mechanism of prednisolone treatment for AAN is still unclear. Moreover, prednisolone plays an important role in glucose homeostasis, but the relationship between prednisolone and glycolysis, including the impact of methylglyoxal, a by-product of glycolysis, has never been studied. The proteomics study with fluorogenic derivatization-liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (FD-LC-MS/MS) was introduced in 2004 [14, 15]. This FD-LC-MS/MS method was widely applied to screening proteins in cell lines [16], rat [17], mouse models [18]. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore the effect of prednisolone on changes in glycolysis-related protein expression using FD-LC-MS/MS method in the AAN mice model and clarify the pharmacological mechanisms of prednisolone in AAN model.

Materials and methods

Animal experiments

All of the animal use protocols were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee/Panel of Taipei Medical University (IACUC Approval No: LAC-2013-0282), and the performance was complied with the relevant regulations. The AAN model and experiments protocols were followed previous studies. Six-week‐old female C3H/He mice were randomly divided into three groups: normal (N), aristolochic acid (AA), and aristolochic acid + prednisolone (AA+P) groups (n = 10 each group). The AA and AA+P group mice received ad libitum access to 3.0 μg/mL of AA-distilled water (0.5 mg/kg/day) orally for 56 days according to the previous study [18]. For the next 14 days, AA+P group were gavage fed prednisolone (2 mg/kg/day), and AA group were gavage administrated water, respectively. The N group mice drank water during the study period. Mouse urine was collected within 12 hours on days 0, 7, and 14 via a metabolic cage (Tokiwa Chemical Industries Co. Ltd, Japan) [18]. All the mice were sacrificed on day 14. All of the harvested urine, kidney tissue, and blood were stored at -80°C before analysis [1820].

Biochemical assays

All biochemical parameters from each of the 30 mice were measured. Blood urea nitrogen (BUN) was determined using a Beckman blood urea nitrogen kit, and serum creatinine (Scr) was measured with a DxC 600 chemistry analyzer (Beckman Coulter, IN USA) [18]. The fluorometric method was used to determine the activity of urinary NAG, which was defined as the production of 4-MU from 4-MU-NAG in 100 mM citrate buffer (pH 4.6–5.0) within 15 minutes, and the activity was measured at 370 nm/460 nm (excitation/emission wavelength) [21]. Urinary protein was determined via the Bradford method [22]. All the work of this study was shown in Fig 1.

Fig 1. Flow chart for the current study.

Fig 1

Analysis of kidney tissues: (1) Paraffin-embedded kidney sections were stained with periodic acid–Schiff (PAS) stain and Masson trichrome stain; the cryostat kidney sections underwent immunofluorescence studies in order to determine transforming TGF-β, matrix metallopeptidase 9 (MMP9), and human growth factor (HGF); (2) The kidney samples homogenized with CHAPS (aq) were used for the proteomics study. Before analysis, the proteins were quantitated with the bicinchoninic acid (BCA) protein assay. The kidney sample proteins were derivatized with 4-[2-(dimethylamino)ethylaminosulfonyl]-7-chloro-,1,3-benzoxadiazole] (DAABD-Cl) and then separated by fluorescence detection-high-performance liquid chromatography (FD-HPLC). The altered peak fractions were compared and collected, digested with trypsin, and analyzed by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Finally, the altered proteins were identified with the MASCOT software. (3) Immunoblotting analyses for GLO1, TPI, and aldolase B protein expressions were performed to confirm proteomic study findings. Blood samples were collected to analyze BUN and serum creatinine (Scr). Urine samples were collected to analyze urinary NAG activity and protein, methylglyoxal, and D-lactate levels. Aldolase B, fructose-bisphosphate aldolase B; CHAPs (aq); DAABD-Cl; FD-HPLC, high performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection; GLO1, glyoxalase 1; LC-MS/MS, liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry; TPI, triosephosphate isomerase.

Histological examination

All of the kidneys from the 30 mice were embedded with paraffin, and the sections were sliced into 4 to 5 μm sections [18, 19]. The kidney sections were stained with periodic acid–Schiff (PAS) (395B, Sigma-Aldrich, Inc., MO, USA) and Masson trichrome stain (HT15, Sigma-Aldrich, Inc., MO, USA) according to the manufacturers’ instructions.

Immunofluorescence study

Samples from kidneys from the 30 mice were prepared for immunofluorescence study which were performed previously [18]. Briefly, the cryostat sections (4 μm) were incubated with rabbit polyclonal transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-β) antibody (21898-1-AP, Proteintech Group, Inc, IL, USA), rabbit polyclonal matrix metallopeptidase 9 (MMP9) (N-Terminal) antibody (10375-2-AP, Proteintech Group, Inc, IL, USA), or rabbit polyclonal anti-human growth factor (HGF) antibody (ab83760, Abcam, OR, USA) for 30 min at room temperature, and all the primary antibodies were diluted with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) at 1:100. The sections were washed with PBS for three times. Under dark environment, the sections were reacted with tetramethyl rhodamine isothiocyanate (TRITC)-labeled anti-rabbit IgG (T6778, Sigma-Aldrich, Inc., MO, USA) and washed with PBS for three times. The images were de‐convoluted and processed using a laser confocal microscope, Olympus FV500 (Tokyo, Japan). The positive area (red) was quantified using FluoView Olympus version 4.0 (Tokyo, Japan) [18].

Proteomics study

Sample preparation

Six kidney samples from each group (n = 10) were selected for the proteomics study. First, about 50 mg of kidney tissue was homogenized with 300 μL of 10 mM 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl) dimethylammonio] propanesulfonic acid(aq) (CHAPS(aq)) and measured the amount of protein using BCA Pierce BCA Protein Assay Kit [17, 18].

Each of the homogenate was diluted into 4 mg/mL. The 10 μL of homogenate was reacted with 20 μL of 10 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid disodium salt (EDTA·2Na), 20 μL of 50 mM CHAPS(aq), 20 μL of 2.5 mM tris (2‐carboxyethyl) phosphine, 25 μL of 8 M guanidine buffer (pH 8.5), and 5 μL of 140 mM 7‐chloro‐N‐[2‐(dimethylamino)ethyl]‐2,1,3‐benzoxadiazole‐4‐sulfonamide (DAABD‐Cl) in acetonitrile (MeCN). Second, the mixture was derivatized under 40°C for 10 min and terminated with 3 μL of 20% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA).

FD‐HPLC conditions for protein separation and quantification

Forty microliters of the reaction mixture (15.5 μg protein) were injected into the FD‐HPLC at a flow rate of 0.55 mL/min and separated on with the IMTAKT WX‐RP column (250 × 4.6 mm, 3 μm particle size, Imtakt Co., Kyoto, Japan) at 60°C. Mobile phase A (H2O/MeCN/isopropanol/TFA = 90/9/1/0.15), mobile phase B (H2O/MeCN/isopropanol/TFA = 30/69/1/0.15), and mobile phase C (H2O/MeCN/isopropanol/TFA = 95/4/1/0.20) were used [17, 18]. The gradient program is described in S1 Table. The fraction was monitored at 505 nm (excitation wavelength: 395 nm). Based on the specific retention time of the derivatives, all of the corresponding peaks of the proteins were quantified by peak height. The FD-HPLC chromatograms of N, AA and AA+P groups were compared by each peak height using Kruskal-Wallis test, and only the altered peak fractions among three groups were manually collected according to the chromatograms for protein identifications.

Identification of DAABD-derivatized proteins

Each of the collected peak fractions (altered peaks among three groups) was concentrated to 5 μL under the condition of reduced pressure. In order to identify the DAABD-derivatized proteins by using liquid chromatography tandem-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), the residue from the above step was digested with 20 μL of 50 mM NH4HCO3 (pH 7.8), 2.5 μL of 10 mM CaCl2, and 2.5 μL trypsin for 2 h at 37°C. Six microliters of the peptide mixture was directly subjected to LC-MS/MS (Agilent, CA, USA), including NanoLC Agilent 1200, HPLC Agilent 1100, and API 4000Q TRAP. Each sample was loaded onto a nanoprecolumn (Zorbax 300SB-C18; 5 x 0.3mm I.D.; Agilent) in the injection loop and eluted with 0.10% TFA in 2.0% MeCN at 30 mL/min using the Agilent 1100 pump. Then, the peptides were separated in a C18 NanoEase column (75 μm × 100 mm, 3.5 μm particle size; Waters Corporation, CA, USA) at a flow rate of 0.2 μL/min. The mobile phases included mobile phase A (H2O/formic acid [FA] = 99.9/0.1) and mobile phase B (MeCN/FA = 99.9/0.1), and the gradient elusion was performed for 45 min: 1.0% mobile phase B at the beginning; 50% mobile phase B at 31 min; 85% mobile phase B at 33 min; held for 3 min; and returned to 1% mobile phase B at 37 min. All of the peptides were sprayed into the mass spectrometry (MS; API 4000Q TRAP; Agilent) via a distal coated fused‐silica needle (75 μm tube i.d., 15 μm tip i.d., PicoTip Emitter, New Objective, MA, USA). One‐second MS/MS scans were conducted on each precursor ion. The detected ions with m/z between 350 and 1250 were fragmented with capillary energies ranging from 1300–2500 V, and the temperature of the interface heater was set at 150°C.

These collected peptides were identified using MASCOT according to previously published methods [17, 18]. MASCOT version 2.2 against the National Center for Biotechnology Information was used to analyze the data. The searching parameters of MASCOT were set as the following: taxonomy: mouse; enzyme: trypsin; allowing less than one missed cleavage peptide; peptide charge: 1+, 2+, 3+; variable modification: DAABD-thiol reside of cysteine. The peptide tolerance was set at 1.2 Da, and mass tolerance for the MS and the tandem MS ions were set at 0.6 Da. Under the situation, MASCOT scores which were higher than 45 were counted as valid peptides. If there were many proteins which shared found peptides, the protein that had the highest score was determined.

Immunoblotting analysis

Six kidney samples from each group (n = 10) were selected to perform immunoblotting analysis.Ten microgram of sample proteins of renal homogenate was loaded into each lane and separated on 12% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gels using an SDS-PAGE system [18]. The proteins on the gels were transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes. Antibodies against glyoxalase 1 (GLO1; GTX105792, GeneTex, Irvine, CA, USA), β‐actin (20536–1‐AP, Proteintech, Rosemont,IL, USA), fructose-bisphosphate aldolase B (aldolase B, GTX101363, GeneTex, Irvine, CA, USA), triosephosphate isomerase (TPI, GTX104618, Irvine, CA, USA), and Goat anti-rabbit IgG (H+L), HRP conjugate (SA00001-2, Rosemont,IL, USA) were used at a dilution of 1:1000, 1:2000, 1:3000, 1:3000, and 1:4000, respectively. The signals corresponding to the bands of GLO1 and β‐actin were measured by the TOOL Sensitive ECL kit. ImageJ was used to quantify the intensity of the bands. The relative GLO1 levels were defined as the ratio of GLO1 to β‐actin intensity. All of the information of antibody was described in S3 Table.

Determination of urinary amount of methylglyoxal

Urinary methylglyoxal amount from all of the mice were determined. The level of urinary methylglyoxal was determined by FD-HPLC according to a previously published method [20, 2325]. In short, the methylglyoxal was incubated with 6-diamino-2,4-dihydroxypyrimidine sulfate (DDP) for 30 min at 60°C and stopped with 0.01 M citric acid (pH 6.0). Twenty μL of the derivative samples was injected into FD-HPLC, and the flow rate was 0.7 mL/min. The derivatized methylglyoxal was separated with a mobile phase (0.01 M citric acid buffer (pH 6.0)/MeCN = 97/3) using an ODS column (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm particle size; Biosil Chemical Co. Ltd., Taipei, Taiwan) at 33°C. These fractions were measured at an emission of 500 nm with an excitation of 330 nm. The amount of urinary methylglyoxal was defined as level of methylglyoxal × 12 h-urinary volume.

Determination of urinary amount of D-lactate

Preparation of urine sample

Urinary D-lactate amount from all of the mice were determined. The column-switching FD-HPLC system was used to determine the levels of urinary D-lactate [19, 26, 27]. Twenty microliter of all urine samples were mixed with 10 μL of propionic acid (as the internal standard [I.S.]) and 170 μL of MeCN before configuration (700 g, 10 min, 4°C). Then, 100 μL of sample supernatants were derivatized with 100 μL of 8 mM 4-nitro-7-piperazino-2,1,3-benzoxadiazole (NBD-PZ) in MeCN, 25 μL of 280 mM 2,2’-dipyridyl disulfide (DPDS) in MeCN, and 25 μL of 280 mM triphenylphosphine (TPP) in MeCN at 30°C for 3 h. Finally, the reaction was stopped with 250 μL of 0.1% TFA(aq), and the derivatives were purified via passing through the MonoSpin SCX cartridge (GL Science Inc., Tokyo, Japan).

Separation of lactate

The urinary lactate derivatives were separated with the mobile phase (H2O/MeCN/methanol/ = 68/12/20) using an Aqu-ODS-W-5u column (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm particle size; Biosil Chemical Co. Ltd, Taipei, Taiwan) at 30°C. The flow rate was set 0.7 mL/min for 0–35 min and 0.9 mL/min for 35.1–60 min [19, 27]. The amount of urinary lactate was defined as lactate levels ×12 h urinary volume.

Enantiomeric separation of D-lactate

The fraction of lactate derivatives was collected and introduced into a Chiralpak AD‐RH column (150 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm particle size; Daicel Co. Osaka, Japan) with the mobile phase (H2O/MeCN = 40/60) at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min. Both the total lactate and D-lactate levels were determined according to the areas of the corresponding peaks on the chromatograms (D-7500 integrator; Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). The derivatives were detected at an emission wavelength of 547 nm with an excitation of 491 nm [19, 27]. Urinary D-lactate amount were defined as levels of D-lactate ×12 h urinary volume.

Statistical analysis

The results are expressed as means ± standard deviation. The significant difference in means was determined using the Kruskal-Wallis test for nonparametric statistics; p‐values less than 0.05 was taken to indicate statistical significance. All of the data analysis was performed using Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS) for Windows 19th version (IBM, IL, USA).

Results

Biochemical assays

There were no significant differences at baseline in NAG (N [1.93 ± 0.15 U/L] vs. AA [1.92 ± 0.12 U/L] vs. AA+P [1.95 ± 0.10 U/L]) and urinary protein (N [1.21 ± 0.34 mg/day] vs. AA [1.17 ± 0.29 mg/day] vs. AA+P [1.26 ± 0.34 mg/day]) among the three groups. BUN (20.67 ± 0.73 vs. 23.00 ± 2.09 mg/dL, p < 0.05), Scr (0.27 ± 0.04 vs. 0.36 ± 0.06 mg/dL, p < 0.05), NAG (2.22 ± 0.42 vs. 2.94 ± 0.13 U/L, p < 0.05), and urinary protein (1.75 ± 0.68 vs. 2.94 ± 0.09 mg/day, p < 0.05) in the AA+P group were significant lower in the AA group on day 14 (Table 1).

Table 1. Biochemical parameters of normal (N), aristocholochic acid (AA), and aristocholochic acid + prednisolone (AA+P) groups.

Group NAG (μM/min/L) UP (mg/day) BUN (mg/dL) Scr (mg/dL)
Baseline Day 14 Baseline Day 14 Day 14 Day 14
N 1.93 ± 0.15 1.93 ± 0.06** 1.21 ± 0.34 1.26 ± 0.20** 17.85 ± 1.91** 0.22 ± 0.07**
AA 1.92 ± 0.12 2.94 ± 0.13 1.17 ± 0.29 2.94 ± 0.09 23.00 ± 2.09 0.36 ± 0.06
AA+P 1.95 ± 0.10 2.22 ± 0.42* 1.26 ± 0.34 1.75 ± 0.68* 20.67 ± 0.73* 0.27 ± 0.04*

There were no significant difference of NAG and UP among N, AA, and AA+P groups at baseline. The BUN, Scr, NAG activity, and UP excretion of N and AA+P group mice significantly decreased on day 14 compared with those of AA-group mice. Baseline was defined as the day at the beginning of experiment (before the mice were administrated AA). N, normal group; AA, aristolochic acid group; AA+P: aristolochic acid + prednisolone; NAG, N-acetyl-β-D-glucosamine; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; Scr, serum creatinine; UP, urinary protein.

*p < 0.05

** p < 0.01 significantly different from the AA group.

Histological examination

Sections stained with PAS in AA-group exhibited pathological damage, including cell infiltration, tubular cell atrophy, and interstitial fibrosis, but those in AA+P group exhibited alleviation. THIS of AA-group (7.34 ± 0.89) was significantly higher than those of N (0.36 ± 0.16), and AA+P-group (2.99 ± 0.89) on day 14 (Fig 2). The histological examination for the Trichrome indicated collagen deposition in the AA group (13.19 ± 1.96%) was significantly higher than that of the mice in the N (6.31 ± 0.26%) and AA+P groups (9.05 ± 1.24%) (p < 0.05) (Fig 3).

Fig 2. Periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) staining and tubulointerstitial histological score (TIHS) of kidney on day 14.

Fig 2

There was generally no damage in the renal cortex of normal-group (N) mice (A). Moderate tubulointerstitial damage existed in the renal cortex of AA-group mice (B). AA+P group mice demonstrated amelioration of tubulointerstitial damage (C). (Periodic acid-Schiff [PAS] stain, 200× magnification). The tubulointerstitial histological scores (TIHS, including cell infiltration, tubular atrophy, and interstitial fibrosis) of mice in the AA group were significantly higher than those of mice in the normal and AA+P groups on day 14 (D). N, normal group; AA, aristolochic acid group; AA+P: AA+P: aristolochic acid + prednisolone.Δ indicates cell infiltration; indicates interstitial fibrosis; # indicates tubular atrophy. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 significantly different from the AA group; # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01 significantly different from the N group.

Fig 3. Masson’s trichrome staining and semi-quantification of collagen deposition on day 14.

Fig 3

Collagen deposition in AA-group mice (B) was more severe than that in AA+P-group mice (C). There was almost no collagen deposition in N-group mice (A). The area of fibrosis was assessed based on the blue coloration in the AA group was higher than that in the N and AA+P groups (D). N, normal group; AA, aristolochic acid group; AA+P: AA+P: aristolochic acid + prednisolone. indicates interstitial fibrosis. * p < 0.05 significantly different from the AA group; # p < 0.05 significantly different from the N group.

Immunofluorescence study

The semi-quantification scores of TGF-β (N [0.35 ± 0.37] vs. AA [6.88 ± 1.18] vs. AA+P [2.67 ± 0.57]) were significantly decreased (p < 0.05); those of MMP-9 (N [0.63 ± 0.42] vs. AA [3.43 ± 1.36] vs. AA+P [11.20 ± 0.84]) and HGF (N [0.23 ± 0.51] vs. AA [2.81 ± 0.83] vs. AA+P [5.79 ± 0.79]) increased in the N and AA+P groups on day 14 (p < 0.05) (Fig 4).

Fig 4. Immunofluorescence staining and semi-quantification in the tubular interstitium on day 14.

Fig 4

Confocal images (A–I) reveal a red color that demonstrates the deposition of TGF-β (A, D, G), MMP-9 (B, E, H), and HGF (C, F, I) in the N, AA, and AA+P groups, respectively. The expression of TGF-β showed amelioration in AA+P-group mice (G) compared with mice in the AA group (D). The fluorescence intensity of MMP-9 (H) and HGF (I) were significantly increased in AA+P-group mice compared with those in the AA group (E, F). The relative fluorescence intensity of TGF-β, MMP-9, and HGF was semi-quantified (J). The expressions of TGF-β (A), MMP-9 (B), and HGF (C) in the N group were the lowest among the three groups. N, normal group; AA, aristolochic acid group; AA+P: aristolochic acid + prednisolone. TGF‐β, transforming growth factor‐β; MMP‐9, matrix metallopeptidase 9; HGF, hepatocyte growth factor. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 significantly different from the AA group; # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01 significantly different from the N group.

Separation and identification of altered proteins

There were 47 altered peaks among the N, AA, and AA+P groups on day 14 (Fig 5), which were identified according to the MASCOT analysis included 39 proteins, including glycolysis, anti-oxidation, ATP synthesis, and apoptosis-related proteins, etc. The amplified chromatograms of Fig 5 (S1 Fig) and all the altered proteins (S2 Table) can be found in supporting information. All of the chromatograms of each group were shown in S2 Fig. Most of the glycolysis-related proteins in the AA+P group were lower than those in the AA group. These glycolysis-related proteins included fructose-bisphosphate aldolase B (aldolase B), glyoxalase 1 (GLO1), pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 α 1 (PDH E1 α 1), M2-type pyruvate kinase (PKM2), triosephosphate isomerase (TPI), phosphoglycerate kinase (PGK) and aldose reductase (AR) (Table 2). The expression of altered protein was shown in Fig 6.

Fig 5. Chromatograms of proteins in the kidneys of mice derivatized with DAABD-Cl on day 14.

Fig 5

The lower, middle, and upper chromatograms were obtained from the kidney homogenates of normal- (red), AA- (green), and AA+P- (blue) group mice, respectively. The 47 altered peaks among three groups were numbered. N, normal group; AA, aristolochic acid group; AA+P: aristolochic acid + prednisolone; DAABD-Cl, 7-chloro-N-[2-(dimethylamino)ethyl]-2,1,3-benzoxadiazole- 4-sulfonamide.

Table 2. Comparison of glycolysis-related proteins among the N, AA, and AA+P groups on day 14.

Peak
numbera
N: AA: AA+P
(Ratio)
Protein Molecular mass (Da) GI number
22 1: 6.56#: 0.87* Fructose-bisphosphate aldolase B 39,548 gi|15723268
22 1: 6.56#: 0.87* Glyoxalase 1 20,826 gi|19354350
22 1: 6.56#: 0.87* Pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 α 1 43,204 gi|6679261
28 1: 13.40#: 4.06 M2-type pyruvate kinase 57,878 gi|1405933
32 1: 39.00#: 1.85* Triosephosphate isomerase 26,679 gi|54855
32 1: 39.00#: 1.85* Phosphoglycerate kinase 59,716 gi|6679937
32 1: 39.00#: 1.85* Aldose reductase 35,725 gi|786001

aThe peak numbers correspond to those shown in Fig 4.

bThe ratio of AA or AA+P groups to N group is listed in the table; the intensity of the N group was set at 1.

cNCBI processed each consecutive sequence record as GI number, a simple series of digits. N, normal group; AA, aristolochic acid group; AA+P: aristolochic acid + prednisolone.

*p < 0.05, significantly different from the AA group

# p < 0.05, significantly different from the N group.

Fig 6. Altered peak heights corresponding to the glycolysis-related proteins.

Fig 6

The altered peak no. 22, 28 and 32 were compared in Fig 4 and identified glycolysis-related proteins by MASCOT. Peak numbers are the same as in Table 1. Aldolase B: fructose-bisphosphate aldolase B; GLO1: glyoxalase 1; PDH E1 α 1: pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 α 1; PKM2: M2-type pyruvate kinase; TPI: triosephosphate isomerase; PGK: phosphoglycerate kinase; AR: aldose reductase. * p < 0.05 significantly different from the AA group; # p < 0.05 significantly different from the N group.

Immunoblotting analysis

The differences in GLO1, aldolase B, and TPI expressions were similar among the three groups (Fig 7A, 7B and 7C). On day 14, the GLO1 protein expression in the kidney homogenate of the N (100.0 ± 30.9%) and AA+P (108.9 ± 10.7%) groups were significantly lower than those of the AA group (191.60 ± 61.1%) (p < 0.05) (Fig 7D), which were similar to the FD‐LC-MS/MS proteomics findings. Moreover, aldolase B protein expression in the kidney homogenate of the N (100 ± 36.3%) and AA+P (136.2 ± 54.7%) groups were significantly lower than those of the AA group (223.6 ± 52.5%) (p< 0.05) as shown in Fig 7E.TPI protein expression in the kidney homogenate of the N (100.0 ± 19.6%) and AA+P (121.4 ± 9.3%) groups were significantly lower than those of the AA group (181.5 ±25.9%) (p < 0.05) (Fig 7F). All the immunoblotting were shown in S3 Fig.

Fig 7. Immunoblotting analysis of GLO1, aldolase B, and TPI in kidney homogenates on day 14.

Fig 7

Expression of GLO1 (A), aldolase B (B), and TPI (C) among the three groups on day 14. The β‐actin was used as the internal standard. Semi-quantitation of the relative GLO1 (D), aldolase B (E), and TPI (F) level. The expression of relative GLO1, aldolase B, and TPI level decreased in the AA+P group compared with the AA group. N, normal group; AA, aristolochic acid group; AA+P: aristolochic acid + prednisolone; GLO1, glyoxalase 1; aldolase B,fructose-bisphosphate aldolase B;TPI, triosephosphate isomerase. * p < 0.05 significantly different from the AA group; # p < 0.05 significantly different from the N group.

Amount of methylglyoxal in urine

The amount of urinary methylglyoxal in the AA (3.413 ± 0.596 μg) and AA+P (3.362 ± 1.049 μg) groups were significantly higher than those in the N group (1.561 ± 0.752 μg) on day 0, but those in both N (1.878 ± 0.396 μg) and AA+P (2.004 ± 0.301 μg) groups were significantly lower than those in the AA group (2.741 ± 0.630 μg) on day 14 (p < 0.05) (Fig 8).

Fig 8. The amount of methylglyoxal in the urine on days 0 and 14.

Fig 8

The amount of urinary methylglyoxal in the N group was lower than that in the AA group on days 0 and 14. There was no significance in the amount of urinary methylglyoxal between the AA and AA+P groups on day 0, but the amount of urinary methylglyoxal in the AA+P group was significantly lower than that in the AA group on day 14. N, normal group; AA, aristolochic acid group; AA+P: aristolochic acid + prednisolone. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 significantly different from the AA group; # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01 significantly different from the N group.

Amount of total and D-lactate in urine

The amount of urinary total lactate in AA (1.032 ± 0.245 and 0.873 ± 0.322 mmol) and AA+P (1.008 ± 0.307 and 0.756 ± 0.278 mmol) were significantly higher than that in the N group (0.250 ± 0.086 and 0.429 ± 0.147 mmol) on day 0 and 14 (p < 0.05) (Fig 8). Moreover, the amount of urinary D-lactate in AA (105.7 ± 47.4 μmol) and AA+P (129.9 ± 31.2 μmol) were significantly higher than that in the N (3.557 ± 2.370 μmol) group on day 0 (p < 0.05); but the amount of urinary D-lactate in the N (10.10 ± 5.84 μmol) and AA+P (54.07 ± 5.45 μmol) groups were significantly lower than those in the AA group (86.09 ± 8.44 μmol) on day 14 (Fig 9).

Fig 9. The amount of total lactate and D-lactate in the urine on days 0 and 14.

Fig 9

The chromatograph of total lactate separation on days 0 (A) and 14 (C). The chromatograph of D-lactate separation on days 0 (B) and 14 (D). The amount of urinary total lactate in the N group was lower than that in the AA and AA+P groups, and there was no significance between the AA and AA+P groups on days 0 or 14 (E). The amount of urinary D-lactate in the N group was lower than that in the AA and AA+P groups on days 0 and 14. There was no significance in the amount of urinary D-lactate between the AA and AA+P groups on day 0, but the amount of urinary D-lactate in the AA+P group was significantly lower than that in the AA group on day 14 (g). N, normal group; AA, aristolochic acid group; AA+P: aristolochic acid + prednisolone. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 significantly different from the AA group; # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01 significantly different from the N group.

Discussion

Tubulointerstitial injury, such as interstitial renal fibrosis, tubular cell atrophy, and cell infiltration, was truly induced via administration of AA-distilled water for 56 days as noted in the previous findings [18]. After chronic inflammation, macrophage accumulation leads to fibrosis via activation of the fibrosis-related myofibroblasts which release extracellular matrix to repair the damage tissue. These histological results differed from the findings in other acute model which was acute tubular necrosis caused by short-term administration of high-dose AA (5–10 mg/kg/day) [19, 20]. However, the long-term use of low-dose AA induces interstitial renal fibrosis, which is similar to human AAN as noted in the first AAN report [1].

Consistent with the finding by Vanherweghem et al., this study also demonstrated the efficacy of prednisolone for AAN, which supported by improvement of tubular damage and collagen deposition, as well as immune markers (decreased in TGF-β expression and increased HGF and MMP-9 expression). In order to explore prednisolone-induced proteins, this study was the first research to use the proteomics study with FD-LC-MS/MS method to screen proteins after prednisolone treatment, demonstrating that most of the glycolysis-related proteins increased in the AA group and decreased in the AA+P group. Expression of ATP-related proteins also showed similar to glycolysis-related proteins. This might be related to ATP consumption and glycolysis activation due to renal damage and mitochondrial permeability transition pore [20, 28, 29]. After renal damage, dysfunctions of mitochondrial homeostasis and ATP consumption lead to ATP depletion in acute ischemic kidney injury and diabetic nephropathy [30, 31]. Glycolysis, which harvests energy for repair and regeneration of proximal tubule epithelial cells, are composed of three steps. First, glucose converts into fructose 1,6-bisphosphate via phosphorylation. Moreover, aldose reductase converts some of glucoses into sorbitol which is one of the source of fructose 1,6-bisphosphate [32]. Second, fructose 1,6-bisphosphate is cleaved into glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate (GAP) and dihydroxyacetone phosphate (DHAP) catalyzing by aldolase B [33]. TPI catalyzes the isomerization of DHAP to GAP which is on the direct pathway of glycolysis, and some of DHAP metabolize into methylglyoxal by methylglyoxal synthase [34, 35]. Finally, PGK, pyruvate kinase, and other enzymes successively involve in oxidation of GAP until production of pyruvate and ATP [35, 36]. Moreover, pyruvate dehydrogenase catalyzes pyruvate to acetyl-CoA which enter into Kreb cycle for energy production [37].

Several studies have proven the relationship between prednisolone and glucose homeostasis, particularly gluconeogenesis and insulin resistance, but the essential glycolysis-related protein, GLO1, was found in the present study. GLO1 is the enzyme of glyoxalase system which is the major pathway to detoxify methylglyoxal [38]. GLO1, the rate-limiting enzyme, spontaneously catalyses the conversion of methylglyoxal-GSH hemithioacetal into thioester S-D-lactoylglutathione [39]. This step is the most important in metabolism of methylglyoxal into D-lactate [39, 40]. GLO2 metabolizes S-D-lactoylglutathione to D-lactate and GSH. The renal protective effect of GLO1 has been proven in different models of kidney injury, and the downregulation of GLO1 expression exacerbates the renal function [4143]. Kumagai et al. indicated that the GLO1 protein expression in sham group is similar to those in ischemia/reperfusion injury group in an acute rat model [41], but the change of D-lactate has not been determined. However, methylglyoxal, D-lactate, and GLO1 simultaneously increased after 56 days of AA administration in this study. The different findings suggest that the duration of the study period and the severity of tubular injury might impact on GLO1 expression. First, although the mechanism of GLO1 induction is unclear, enzyme induction is a time-consuming process. Second, GLO1, which exists in the cytosol of each cell, might be depleted if the death of tubular epithelial cells occurs during the progression of necrosis.

Methylglyoxal, one of by-products from glycolysis, leads to cell apoptosis and cytotoxicity due to reactive carbonyl groups which reacts with proteins and nucleic acids. These methylglyoxal-adducts are called advanced glycation end products (AGEs) and lose their function [4446]. Several studies have indicated that methylglyoxal and D-lactate increase under condition of renal damage or disease. Thus, the plausible mechanisms of methylglyoxal-exacerbating AAN are noted below. First, the binding of AGEs and its receptors upregulates inflammatory effects via nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB) [47] and early growth response-1 (Egr-1) [48]. Second, methylglyoxal increases oxidative stress, which is assessed via the level of glutathione in the kidneys of mice that received AA due to accumulation of methylglyoxal and Nε-(carboxymethyl)lysine (CML) [25]. Third, methylglyoxal-modified collagen might exacerbate interstitial renal fibrosis via the activation of myofibroblasts [49], the inhibition of collagen phagocytosis [50], and changes in the structure of the extracellular matrix [51].

Conclusion

This study firstly suggested that prednisolone successfully alleviated inflammation and interstitial renal fibrosis and then inhibited glycolysis, which consequently led to reduce methylglyoxal, GLO1, and D-lactate, as well as other glycolysis-related proteins. These findings supported that inhibition of glycolysis might be one of the mechanisms in prednisolone treatment for AAN. These glycolysis parameters (methylglyoxal, GLO1, and D-lactate) increased in the chronic AAN, which were quite different from acute kidney injury model. Since this FD-LC-MS/MS method was indeed helpful for exploring pathological and pharmacological mechanisms, it could be applied to screening disease-related proteins in the future.

Supporting information

S1 Table. The gradient elution program of FD‐HPLC conditions for protein separation.

(PDF)

S2 Table. Altered proteins in the kidney homogenate among three groups on Day14.

aThe peak numbers correspond to those described in Fig 3. bThe ratio of AA or AA+P groups to N group showed in the table, and the intensity of N group was regarded as “1”. cNCBI processed each consecutive sequence record as GI number, a simple series of digits. N, normal group; AA, aristolochic acid group; AA+P: aristolochic acid+prednisolone. *p < 0.05, significantly different from AA group; # p < 0.05, significantly different from N group.

(PDF)

S3 Table. Antibody.

(PDF)

S1 Fig. The detailed and amplified chromatograms of Fig 5.

The lower, middle, and upper chromatograms were obtained from the kidney homogenates of N- (red), AA- (green), and AA+P- (blue) group mice, respectively. The 47 altered peaks among three groups were numbered.

(PDF)

S2 Fig. The chromatograms of FD-HPLC for separating proteins.

AA+P indicated the six chromatograms of AA+P group; AA indicated the six chromatograms of AA group; N indicated the six chromatograms of N group.

(PDF)

S3 Fig. The immunoblotting images for Fig 7.

(A) Both of the partial membranes which blotted GLO1 and β‐actin antibodies were acquired from the same gel. After the proteins of gel were transferred onto the nitrocellulose membrane, the membrane was blocked with 10% skim milk. Before incubated with primary antibodies, the membrane was cut into two parts. One partial membrane was incubated with anti-GLO1 antibody, and another was incubated with anti-β‐actin antibody, respectively. (B) Both of the band of aldolase B and β‐actin were acquired from the same gel and same membrane. (C) Both of the band of TPI and β‐actin were acquired from the same gel and same membrane.

(PDF)

S1 Raw Images. WB beta-actin.

(TIF)

S2 Raw Images. WB GLO1.

(TIF)

S3 Raw Images. WB Aldolase B & beta-actin.

(TIF)

S4 Raw Images. WB TPI & beta-actin.

(TIF)

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the Yung Shin Pharmaceutical Co. (Taiwan) for their contribution of an API 4000 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer. We appreciate that Prof Ueda Shiro supplied our team the suggestion about animal experiments and metabolic cages. We thank for Prof Jen-Ai Lee supplying the technology of FD-LC-MS/MS. We are grateful to the financial support from the Cathay General Hospital (108CGH-TMU-06).

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

We are grateful to the financial support from the Cathay General Hospital (108CGH-TMU-06).

References

  • 1.Vanherweghem JL, Depierreux M, Tielemans C, Abramowicz D, Dratwa M, Jadoul M, et al. Rapidly progressive interstitial renal fibrosis in young women: association with slimming regimen including Chinese herbs. Lancet. 1993;341(8842):387–91. Epub 1993/02/13. 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92984-2 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Depierreux M, Van Damme B, Vanden Houte K, Vanherweghem JL. Pathologic aspects of a newly described nephropathy related to the prolonged use of Chinese herbs. Am J Kidney Dis. 1994;24(2):172–80. Epub 1994/08/01. 10.1016/s0272-6386(12)80178-8 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kumar V, Poonam, Prasad AK, Parmar VS. Naturally occurring aristolactams, aristolochic acids and dioxoaporphines and their biological activities. Natural product reports. 2003;20(6):565–83. Epub 2004/01/01. 10.1039/b303648k . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chen YY, Chung JG, Wu HC, Bau DT, Wu KY, Kao ST, et al. Aristolochic acid suppresses DNA repair and triggers oxidative DNA damage in human kidney proximal tubular cells. Oncol Rep. 2010;24(1):141–53. Epub 2010/06/02. 10.3892/or_00000839 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chen IH, Luo HL, Su YL, Huang CC, Chiang PH, Yu CC, et al. Aristolochic Acid Affects Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer Behavior through the MAPK Pathway. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland). 2019;24(20) Epub 2019/10/18. 10.3390/molecules24203707 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Jadot I, Decleves AE, Nortier J, Caron N. An Integrated View of Aristolochic Acid Nephropathy: Update of the Literature. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(2) Epub 2017/02/02. 10.3390/ijms18020297 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Vanherweghem JL, Abramowicz D, Tielemans C, Depierreux M. Effects of steroids on the progression of renal failure in chronic interstitial renal fibrosis: a pilot study in Chinese herbs nephropathy. Am J Kidney Dis. 1996;27(2):209–15. Epub 1996/02/01. 10.1016/s0272-6386(96)90542-9 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ma DH, Zheng FL, Su Y, Li MX, Guo MH. Influence and analysis of low-dosage steroid therapy in severe aristolochic acid nephropathy patients. Nephrology (Carlton). 2016;21(10):835–40. Epub 2015/11/27. 10.1111/nep.12684 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Coutinho AE, Chapman KE. The anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effects of glucocorticoids, recent developments and mechanistic insights. Molecular and cellular endocrinology. 2011;335(1):2–13. 10.1016/j.mce.2010.04.005 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lim SS, Conn DL. The use of low-dose prednisone in the management of rheumatoid arthritis. Bull Rheum Dis. 2001;50(12):1–4. Epub 2002/10/22. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ruiz-Arruza I, Barbosa C, Ugarte A, Ruiz-Irastorza G. Comparison of high versus low-medium prednisone doses for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus patients with high activity at diagnosis. Autoimmun Rev. 2015;14(10):875–9. Epub 2015/06/06. 10.1016/j.autrev.2015.05.011 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sousa AR, Marshall RP, Warnock LC, Bolton S, Hastie A, Symon F, et al. Responsiveness to oral prednisolone in severe asthma is related to the degree of eosinophilic airway inflammation. Clin Exp Allergy. 2017;47(7):890–9. Epub 2017/05/12. 10.1111/cea.12954 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Baudoux T, Husson C, De Prez E, Jadot I, Antoine M-H, Nortier JL, et al. CD4(+) and CD8(+) T Cells Exert Regulatory Properties During Experimental Acute Aristolochic Acid Nephropathy. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):5334–. 10.1038/s41598-018-23565-2 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ichibangase T, Moriya K, Koike K, Imai K. A proteomics method revealing disease-related proteins in livers of hepatitis-infected mouse model. Journal of proteome research. 2007;6(7):2841–9. Epub 2007/06/15. 10.1021/pr070094c . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Masuda M, Toriumi C, Santa T, Imai K. Fluorogenic derivatization reagents suitable for isolation and identification of cysteine-containing proteins utilizing high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Analytical chemistry. 2004;76(3):728–35. Epub 2004/01/31. 10.1021/ac034840i . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ichibangase T, Imai K. Straightforward proteomic analysis reveals real dynamics of proteins in cells. Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis. 2014;101:31–9. Epub 2014/06/24. 10.1016/j.jpba.2014.05.036 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Tsai PY, Chen SM, Chen HY, Li YC, Imai K, Hsu KY, et al. Proteome analysis of altered proteins in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rat kidney using the fluorogenic derivatization-liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. Biomed Chromatogr. 2013;27(3):382–9. Epub 2012/09/14. 10.1002/bmc.2803 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lin CE, Chang WS, Lee JA, Chang TY, Huang YS, Hirasaki Y, et al. Proteomics analysis of altered proteins in kidney of mice with aristolochic acid nephropathy using the fluorogenic derivatization-liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. Biomed Chromatogr. 2018;32(3) Epub 2017/11/01. 10.1002/bmc.4127 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Huang TC, Chen SM, Li YC, Lee JA. Urinary d-lactate levels reflect renal function in aristolochic acid-induced nephropathy in mice. Biomed Chromatogr. 2013;27(9):1100–6. Epub 2013/04/05. 10.1002/bmc.2908 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Huang TC, Chen SM, Li YC, Lee JA. Increased renal semicarbazide-sensitive amine oxidase activity and methylglyoxal levels in aristolochic acid-induced nephrotoxicity. Life Sci. 2014;114(1):4–11. Epub 2014/08/12. 10.1016/j.lfs.2014.07.034 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Leaback DH, Walker PG. Studies on glucosaminidase. 4. The fluorimetric assay of N-acetyl-beta-glucosaminidase. The Biochemical journal. 1961;78(1):151–6. 10.1042/bj0780151 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry. 1976;72(1):248–54. 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Espinosa-Mansilla A, Duran-Meras I, Canada FC, Marquez MP. High-performance liquid chromatographic determination of glyoxal and methylglyoxal in urine by prederivatization to lumazinic rings using in serial fast scan fluorimetric and diode array detectors. Anal Biochem. 2007;371(1):82–91. Epub 2007/09/22. 10.1016/j.ab.2007.07.028 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Huang YS, Li YC, Tsai PY, Lin CE, Chen CM, Chen SM, et al. Accumulation of methylglyoxal and d-lactate in Pb-induced nephrotoxicity in rats. Biomed Chromatogr. 2017;31(5) Epub 2016/10/16. 10.1002/bmc.3869 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Li YC, Tsai SH, Chen SM, Chang YM, Huang TC, Huang YP, et al. Aristolochic acid-induced accumulation of methylglyoxal and Nepsilon-(carboxymethyl)lysine: an important and novel pathway in the pathogenic mechanism for aristolochic acid nephropathy. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2012;423(4):832–7. Epub 2012/06/21. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.06.049 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Fukushima T, Lee JA, Korenaga T, Ichihara H, Kato M, Imai K. Simultaneous determination of D-lactic acid and 3-hydroxybutyric acid in rat plasma using a column-switching HPLC with fluorescent derivatization with 4-nitro-7-piperazino-2,1,3-benzoxadiazole (NBD-PZ). Biomed Chromatogr. 2001;15(3):189–95. Epub 2001/06/08. 10.1002/bmc.60 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lee J-A, Tsai Y-C, Chen H-Y, Wang C-C, Chen S-M, Fukushima T, et al. Fluorimetric determination of d-lactate in urine of normal and diabetic rats by column-switching high-performance liquid chromatography. Analytica Chimica Acta. 2005;534(2):185–91. 10.1016/j.aca.2004.11.033. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Zhou Y, Bian X, Fang L, He W, Dai C, Yang J. Aristolochic acid causes albuminuria by promoting mitochondrial DNA damage and dysfunction in podocyte. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e83408–e. 10.1371/journal.pone.0083408 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Qi X, Cai Y, Gong L, Liu L, Chen F, Xiao Y, et al. Role of mitochondrial permeability transition in human renal tubular epithelial cell death induced by aristolochic acid. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2007;222(1):105–10. Epub 2007/05/25. 10.1016/j.taap.2007.03.029 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Szeto HH, Liu S, Soong Y, Wu D, Darrah SF, Cheng FY, et al. Mitochondria-targeted peptide accelerates ATP recovery and reduces ischemic kidney injury. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;22(6):1041–52. Epub 2011/05/07. 10.1681/ASN.2010080808 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Qi H, Casalena G, Shi S, Yu L, Ebefors K, Sun Y, et al. Glomerular Endothelial Mitochondrial Dysfunction Is Essential and Characteristic of Diabetic Kidney Disease Susceptibility. Diabetes. 2017;66(3):763–78. Epub 2016/12/03. 10.2337/db16-0695 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Vander Jagt DL, Robinson B, Taylor KK, Hunsaker LA. Reduction of trioses by NADPH-dependent aldo-keto reductases. Aldose reductase, methylglyoxal, and diabetic complications. The Journal of biological chemistry. 1992;267(7):4364–9. Epub 1992/03/05. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Liu J, Wang R, Desai K, Wu L. Upregulation of aldolase B and overproduction of methylglyoxal in vascular tissues from rats with metabolic syndrome. Cardiovascular research. 2011;92(3):494–503. Epub 2011/09/06. 10.1093/cvr/cvr239 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Phillips SA, Thornalley PJ. The formation of methylglyoxal from triose phosphates. Investigation using a specific assay for methylglyoxal. European journal of biochemistry. 1993;212(1):101–5. Epub 1993/02/15. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1993.tb17638.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hopper DJ, Cooper RA. The purification and properties of Escherichia coli methylglyoxal synthase. Biochem J. 1972;128(2):321–9. 10.1042/bj1280321 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Li XB, Gu JD, Zhou QH. Review of aerobic glycolysis and its key enzymes—new targets for lung cancer therapy. Thoracic cancer. 2015;6(1):17–24. Epub 2015/08/15. 10.1111/1759-7714.12148 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Sharma N, Okere IC, Brunengraber DZ, McElfresh TA, King KL, Sterk JP, et al. Regulation of pyruvate dehydrogenase activity and citric acid cycle intermediates during high cardiac power generation. J Physiol. 2005;562(Pt 2):593–603. Epub 11/18. 10.1113/jphysiol.2004.075713 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Rabbani N, Thornalley PJ. Dicarbonyl proteome and genome damage in metabolic and vascular disease. Biochemical Society transactions. 2014;42(2):425–32. Epub 2014/03/22. 10.1042/BST20140018 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Sousa Silva M, Gomes RA, Ferreira AE, Ponces Freire A, Cordeiro C. The glyoxalase pathway: the first hundred years … and beyond. Biochem J. 2013;453(1):1–15. Epub 2013/06/15. 10.1042/BJ20121743 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Nigro C, Leone A, Raciti GA, Longo M, Mirra P, Formisano P, et al. Methylglyoxal-Glyoxalase 1 Balance: The Root of Vascular Damage. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(1) Epub 2017/01/21. 10.3390/ijms18010188 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kumagai T, Nangaku M, Kojima I, Nagai R, Ingelfinger JR, Miyata T, et al. Glyoxalase I overexpression ameliorates renal ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2009;296(4):F912–21. Epub 2009/02/13. 10.1152/ajprenal.90575.2008 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Brouwers O, Niessen PM, Miyata T, Ostergaard JA, Flyvbjerg A, Peutz-Kootstra CJ, et al. Glyoxalase-1 overexpression reduces endothelial dysfunction and attenuates early renal impairment in a rat model of diabetes. Diabetologia. 2014;57(1):224–35. Epub 2013/10/29. 10.1007/s00125-013-3088-5 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Giacco F, Du X, D'Agati VD, Milne R, Sui G, Geoffrion M, et al. Knockdown of glyoxalase 1 mimics diabetic nephropathy in nondiabetic mice. Diabetes. 2014;63(1):291–9. Epub 2013/09/26. 10.2337/db13-0316 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Jan CR, Chen CH, Wang SC, Kuo SY. Effect of methylglyoxal on intracellular calcium levels and viability in renal tubular cells. Cell Signal. 2005;17(7):847–55. Epub 2005/03/15. 10.1016/j.cellsig.2004.11.007 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Rosca MG, Mustata TG, Kinter MT, Ozdemir AM, Kern TS, Szweda LI, et al. Glycation of mitochondrial proteins from diabetic rat kidney is associated with excess superoxide formation. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2005;289(2):F420–30. Epub 2005/04/09. 10.1152/ajprenal.00415.2004 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Thornalley PJ. Protein and nucleotide damage by glyoxal and methylglyoxal in physiological systems—role in ageing and disease. Drug metabolism and drug interactions. 2008;23(1–2):125–50. 10.1515/dmdi.2008.23.1-2.125 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Schmidt AM, Hori O, Chen JX, Li JF, Crandall J, Zhang J, et al. Advanced glycation endproducts interacting with their endothelial receptor induce expression of vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) in cultured human endothelial cells and in mice. A potential mechanism for the accelerated vasculopathy of diabetes. J Clin Invest. 1995;96(3):1395–403. Epub 1995/09/01. 10.1172/JCI118175 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Chang JS, Wendt T, Qu W, Kong L, Zou YS, Schmidt AM, et al. Oxygen deprivation triggers upregulation of early growth response-1 by the receptor for advanced glycation end products. Circ Res. 2008;102(8):905–13. Epub 2008/03/08. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.107.165308 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Yuen A, Laschinger C, Talior I, Lee W, Chan M, Birek J, et al. Methylglyoxal-modified collagen promotes myofibroblast differentiation. Matrix Biol. 2010;29(6):537–48. Epub 2010/04/29. 10.1016/j.matbio.2010.04.004 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Chong SA, Lee W, Arora PD, Laschinger C, Young EW, Simmons CA, et al. Methylglyoxal inhibits the binding step of collagen phagocytosis. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(11):8510–20. Epub 2007/01/19. 10.1074/jbc.M609859200 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Nowotny K, Grune T. Degradation of oxidized and glycoxidized collagen: role of collagen cross-linking. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2014;15;542:56-64. Epub 2013 Dec 17. 10.1016/j.abb.2013.12.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Fabio Sallustio

27 Oct 2019

PONE-D-19-27780

Effect of prednisolone on glyoxalase 1 in an inbred mouse model of aristolochic acid nephropathy using proteomics method with FD-LC-MS/MS

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Chen,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

In particular, try to verify the increase of the Fructose-bisphosphate aldolase B and  TPI by conventional immunological assays and to clarify issues in Figure 5 reported by the reviewer #2. Moreover, again in this figure (panels A and C), the standard deviations of the AA group are very high. Please check wether the differences are statistically significant. All other issues raised by reviewers need to be addressed, as well.

In addition, please note that the present manuscript requires copyediting for English grammar and usage. 

We would appreciate receiving your revised manuscript by Dec 11 2019 11:59PM. When you are ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). This letter should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Manuscript'.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Fabio Sallustio

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

1. When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at http://www.journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and http://www.journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2.  Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

3. PLOS ONE now requires that authors provide the original uncropped and unadjusted images underlying all blot or gel results reported in a submission’s figures or Supporting Information files. This policy and the journal’s other requirements for blot/gel reporting and figure preparation are described in detail at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-blot-and-gel-reporting-requirements and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-preparing-figures-from-image-files. When you submit your revised manuscript, please ensure that your figures adhere fully to these guidelines and provide the original underlying images for all blot or gel data reported in your submission. See the following link for instructions on providing the original image data: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-original-images-for-blots-and-gels.

In your cover letter, please note whether your blot/gel image data are in Supporting Information or posted at a public data repository, provide the repository URL if relevant, and provide specific details as to which raw blot/gel images, if any, are not available. Email us at plosone@plos.org if you have any questions.

4. We suggest you thoroughly copyedit your manuscript for language usage, spelling, and grammar. If you do not know anyone who can help you do this, you may wish to consider employing a professional scientific editing service. We understand that you have already had your manuscript edited for English, but we still don't consider it to be of a sufficient standard for publication. 

Whilst you may use any professional scientific editing service of your choice, PLOS has partnered with both American Journal Experts (AJE) and Editage to provide discounted services to PLOS authors. Both organizations have experience helping authors meet PLOS guidelines and can provide language editing, translation, manuscript formatting, and figure formatting to ensure your manuscript meets our submission guidelines. To take advantage of our partnership with AJE, visit the AJE website (http://learn.aje.com/plos/) for a 15% discount off AJE services. To take advantage of our partnership with Editage, visit the Editage website (www.editage.com) and enter referral code PLOSEDIT for a 15% discount off Editage services.  If the PLOS editorial team finds any language issues in text that either AJE or Editage has edited, the service provider will re-edit the text for free.

Upon resubmission, please provide the following:

  • The name of the colleague or the details of the professional service that edited your manuscript

  • A copy of your manuscript showing your changes by either highlighting them or using track changes (uploaded as a *supporting information* file)

  • A clean copy of the edited manuscript (uploaded as the new *manuscript* file)

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The authors studied the effect in terms of altered proteins after prednisolone treatment in a mice model of aristolochic acid nephropathy using a proteomics technique. The authors demonstrated for the first time the biochemical efficacy of prednisolone, and urinary methylglyoxal and its metabolite-D-lactate might be potential biomarkers for aristolochic acid nephropathy. The manuscript shows favorable organization, experiment arrangement, and references. All the data were analyzed and interpreted appropriately. The figures and tables are shown with good quality. Methods described in the manuscript is sufficient to follow. The manuscript contains sufficient data to support its conclusion.

Issues 1: The authors may need to consider polishing the language for a better understanding of international researchers.

Issues 2: The authors need to add more discussion and background in the introduction part.

Minors :

Please use full name in title line.

Please prepare a figure to illustrate the work-flow for the better understanding.

Reviewer #2: COMMENTS TO AUTHORS

Manuscript Number: PONE-D-19-27780

Manuscript Title: Effect of prednisolone on glyoxalase 1 in an inbred mouse model of aristolochic acid nephropathy using proteomics method with FD-LC-MS/MS

Authors: Shih‐Ming Chen, Chia‐En Lin, Hung-Hsiang Chen, Yu-Fan Cheng, Hui-Wen Cheng, Kazuhiro Imai

Comments:

The authors investigate here the effect of prednisolone treatment on the protein expression in a mice model of AAN using a proteomics technique. Six-week‐old female C3H/He mice were randomly divided into three groups: normal (N), aristolochic acid (AA), and aristolochic acid + prednisolone (AA+P) groups (n = 10 each group).The aim of the study is to (1) explore the effect of prednisolone on changes in glycolysis-related protein expression using the FD-LC-MS/MS method and (2) to clarify the pharmacological mechanisms of prednisolone in AA model. The authors found that 1) prednisolone improved tubulointerstitial damage; 2) the glycolysis-related protein glyoxalase 1 (GLO1) decreased in the AA+P group; 3) prednisolone decreased the urinary methylglyoxal which was accompanied with decrease in urinary D-lactate. The authors conclude that 1) The renal protective mechanism of Prednisolone might be associated with down-regulation of GLO1 via reducing the contents of methylglyoxal derived from glycolysis; 2) they demonstrated for the first time the biochemical efficacy of prednisolone, and urinary methylglyoxal and its metabolite-D-lactate might be potential biomarkers for AAN.

This study is well done but some points should be clarified

1) As the authors discussed, the fructose 1,6-bisphosphate is cleaved into glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate (GAP) and dihydroxyacetone phosphate (DHAP) catalyzing by aldolase B. To demonstrate that Prednisolone inhibited glycolysis, which consequently led to reduce methylglyoxal, GLO1, and D-lactate the authors should also verify by a conventional immunological assay the increase of the Fructose-bisphosphate aldolase B and TPI.

2) Its not clear along all the paper how many samples have been used for the different experiments (i.e, how many samples were used for WB analysis?

3) Figure 4

I think , each group chromatogram should be reported with its proper Fluorescence intensity, otherwise chromatograms comparison is not possible.

4) Figure 5

Why did you use peak height instead of peak area to calculate the differences among the 3

different groups of samples? From S1_Fig , peak n. 22 seems higher in Normal (red line) instead of AA (green line); peak n. 28 seems not to be the same in the 3 different chromatograms as well as for peak n.32, which seems to be higher in Normal instead of AA.

5) Figure 8

From Figure 8 A it doesn’t seem that the amount of urinary total lactate in the N group was lower than that in the AA and AA+P groups, instead it seems that the amount of urinary total lactate in the N group was higher than that in the AA and AA+P groups. Please clarify.

6) Table 1

Missing biochemical data at basal (T0) could clarify the differences of the animal groups at the beginning of the study, useful to appreciate and confirm the effect of therap

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files to be viewed.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2020 Jan 22;15(1):e0227838. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227838.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


5 Dec 2019

Dear reviewers,

Thank you for providing these insights. We have received the letter of 2019/10/27 (PONE-D-19-27780). Our research article was entitled “Effect of prednisolone on glyoxalase 1 in an inbred mouse model of aristolochic acid nephropathy using proteomics method with FD-LC-MS/MS by Shih‐Ming Chen, Chia‐En Lin, Hung-Hsiang Chen, Yu-Fan Cheng, Hui-Wen Cheng, Kazuhiro Imai”. The followings are our response to your suggestion and comment. We highlighted the revised paragraph with red color in “Revised Manuscript with Track Changes”, so that you could figure out the the original and revised paragraph. Please refer in "Response to reviewer" file.

Reviewer #1:

Issues 1: The authors may need to consider polishing the language for a better understanding of international researchers.

Answer:

We have corrected the English writing again and provided the certificate from the UNIVERSAL LINK CO., LTD.

Issues 2: The authors need to add more discussion and background in the introduction part.

Answer:

We have increase the paragraph to introduce the background and discussion in the part of introduction, especially the mechanisms of aristolochic acid-induced cytotoxicity and carcinogenicity from the recent study.

Please use full name in title line.

Answer:

We have revised our title according to your suggestion, so we have changed our title as the following.

Please prepare a figure to illustrate the work-flow for the better understanding.

Answer:

We have prepared a flow chart to explain for our study step by step in Fig 1

Reviewer #2: COMMENTS TO AUTHORS

(1)As the authors discussed, the fructose 1,6-bisphosphate is cleaved into glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate (GAP) and dihydroxyacetone phosphate (DHAP) catalyzing by aldolase B. To demonstrate that Prednisolone inhibited glycolysis, which consequently led to reduce methylglyoxal, GLO1, and D-lactate the authors should also verify by a conventional immunological assay the increase of the Fructose-bisphosphate aldolase B and TPI.

Answer:

Thanks for your suggestion. We have performed the immunoblotting for aldolase B and TPI to confirm protein expression. Moreover, we have acquired the similar results to the proteomics findings. We have added these new findings in the part of “Method and materials” and “Results”.

(2) Its not clear along all the paper how many samples have been used for the different experiments (i.e, how many samples were used for WB analysis?

Answer:

All mice of biochemical data (including BUN, Scr, urinary protein, and NAG), sections (PAS stain, Masson trichrome stain, and immunofluourance), urinary methylglyoxal, and urinary D-lactate were determined. We selected six mice from each group to perform proteomics study. We selected six mice from each group to perform immunoblotting for glyoxalase1, aldolase B, and triphosphate isomerase because of the rest of the kidney tissue.

(3) Figure 4

I think , each group chromatogram should be reported with its proper Fluorescence intensity, otherwise chromatograms comparison is not possible.

Answer:

We have reported the chromatograms according to your suggestion. The chromatograms with the correct scales were shown in Fig 5.

4) Figure 5

Why did you use peak height instead of peak area to calculate the differences among the 3 different groups of samples? From S1_Fig , peak n. 22 seems higher in Normal (red line) instead of AA (green line); peak n. 28 seems not to be the same in the 3 different chromatograms as well as for peak n.32, which seems to be higher in Normal instead of AA.

Answer:

Usually, peak area is better than peak height. In our case, each peak has different baseline. If we calculated with peak area, the intensity of the peak might include part of other peak area. This FD-LC-MS/MS method used peak height rather than peak area according to the previous study (Ichibangase et al., Journal of Proteome Research; 2007, 6, 2841-2849).

About this question “From S1_Fig , peak n. 22 seems higher in Normal (red line) instead of AA (green line); peak n. 28 seems not to be the same in the 3 different chromatograms as well as for peak n.32, which seems to be higher in Normal instead of AA.”, we have labeled peak no.22, 28, and 32 of each chromatogram of sample in each group in S2_Fig. According to the results of S2_Fig, we acquired the intensity and expressed as mean ± SD in Table 2 and Table S2. All of this intensity is not only acquired from S1_Fig. Thus, we average the intensity of six sample data from each group and compared among three groups.

5) Figure 8

From Figure 8 A it doesn’t seem that the amount of urinary total lactate in the N group was lower than that in the AA and AA+P groups, instead it seems that the amount of urinary total lactate in the N group was higher than that in the AA and AA+P groups. Please clarify.

Answer:

Answer: Figure 8 A and 8C indicated the “level” of total lactate according to the chromatograms but not the “amount” of total lactate. Figure 8B and 8D indicated the “level” of D-lactate according to the chromatograms but not the “amount” of D-lactate. The amount of total lactate was expressed as: amount of lactate (mmol) = level of lactate (mM) x urinary volume (µL); Expression of D-lactate was similar to expression of total lactate (amount of D-lactate [µmol] = level of lactate [µM] x urinary volume [µL]). Because the level of lactate is very low, we use the amount which could more reflect how much methyglyoxal metabolize into D-lactate in mouse body.

6) Table 1

Missing biochemical data at basal (T0) could clarify the differences of the animal groups at the beginning of the study, useful to appreciate and confirm the effect of therap

Answer: We have determined the urinary data (urinary protein and NAG) on baseline according to your suggestion. However, it is not impossible to acquire the blood data on baseline, because it is necessary to acquire more than 60 µL of blood sample so that we could analyze the data. The body weight of mouse is about 20 g, and it is a high stress to get such volume of blood for a mice. We only can get such large volume, when the mouse were sacrificed. In order to solve this problem, we compared blood data of the “normal group” with AA and AA+P groups on day 14.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to reviewer.docx

Decision Letter 1

Fabio Sallustio

31 Dec 2019

Effect of prednisolone on glyoxalase 1 in an inbred mouse model of aristolochic acid nephropathy using a proteomics method with fluorogenic derivatization-liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

PONE-D-19-27780R1

Dear Dr. Chen,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it complies with all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you will receive an e-mail containing information on the amendments required prior to publication. When all required modifications have been addressed, you will receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will proceed to our production department and be scheduled for publication.

Shortly after the formal acceptance letter is sent, an invoice for payment will follow. To ensure an efficient production and billing process, please log into Editorial Manager at https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the "Update My Information" link at the top of the page, and update your user information. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to enable them to help maximize its impact. If they will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, you must inform our press team as soon as possible and no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

With kind regards,

Fabio Sallustio

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Acceptance letter

Fabio Sallustio

7 Jan 2020

PONE-D-19-27780R1

Effect of prednisolone on glyoxalase 1 in an inbred mouse model of aristolochic acid nephropathy using a proteomics method with fluorogenic derivatization-liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

Dear Dr. Chen:

I am pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper at this point, to enable them to help maximize its impact. If they will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

For any other questions or concerns, please email plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE.

With kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Fabio Sallustio

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Table. The gradient elution program of FD‐HPLC conditions for protein separation.

    (PDF)

    S2 Table. Altered proteins in the kidney homogenate among three groups on Day14.

    aThe peak numbers correspond to those described in Fig 3. bThe ratio of AA or AA+P groups to N group showed in the table, and the intensity of N group was regarded as “1”. cNCBI processed each consecutive sequence record as GI number, a simple series of digits. N, normal group; AA, aristolochic acid group; AA+P: aristolochic acid+prednisolone. *p < 0.05, significantly different from AA group; # p < 0.05, significantly different from N group.

    (PDF)

    S3 Table. Antibody.

    (PDF)

    S1 Fig. The detailed and amplified chromatograms of Fig 5.

    The lower, middle, and upper chromatograms were obtained from the kidney homogenates of N- (red), AA- (green), and AA+P- (blue) group mice, respectively. The 47 altered peaks among three groups were numbered.

    (PDF)

    S2 Fig. The chromatograms of FD-HPLC for separating proteins.

    AA+P indicated the six chromatograms of AA+P group; AA indicated the six chromatograms of AA group; N indicated the six chromatograms of N group.

    (PDF)

    S3 Fig. The immunoblotting images for Fig 7.

    (A) Both of the partial membranes which blotted GLO1 and β‐actin antibodies were acquired from the same gel. After the proteins of gel were transferred onto the nitrocellulose membrane, the membrane was blocked with 10% skim milk. Before incubated with primary antibodies, the membrane was cut into two parts. One partial membrane was incubated with anti-GLO1 antibody, and another was incubated with anti-β‐actin antibody, respectively. (B) Both of the band of aldolase B and β‐actin were acquired from the same gel and same membrane. (C) Both of the band of TPI and β‐actin were acquired from the same gel and same membrane.

    (PDF)

    S1 Raw Images. WB beta-actin.

    (TIF)

    S2 Raw Images. WB GLO1.

    (TIF)

    S3 Raw Images. WB Aldolase B & beta-actin.

    (TIF)

    S4 Raw Images. WB TPI & beta-actin.

    (TIF)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to reviewer.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES