Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 1;19(8):5524–5529. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b02062

Table 2. Most Probable Rupture Forces (Errors Are Full Width at Half-Maximum for Each Rupture Force Distribution) Obtained Different Pulling Speeds and Energy Landscape Parameters (±SD) Based on the DHS Model (v = 0.5).

  most probable rupture force (pN)
Dudko–Hummer–Szabo model
sample 400 nm/s 800 nm/s 1600 nm/s 3200 nm/s ΔG (kBT) Δx (nm) t0 (s)
VHH_WT 68.78 ± 9.85 70.21 ± 10.15 73.04 ± 12.29 73.42 ± 15.65 10.91 ± 1.57 0.61 ± 0.16 11.02 ± 7.93
C24A 67.18 ± 14.12 69.42 ± 15.33 72.72 ± 19.63 76.44 ± 22.55 10.47 ± 3.01 0.59 ± 0.20 12.16 ± 8.91
C98A 65.67 ± 16.07 69.82 ± 19.01 71.6 ± 22.71 75.46 ± 25.16 9.22 ± 1.96 0.49 ± 0.21 3.06 ± 2.87
C24A/C98A 59.11 ± 12.76 64.07 ± 14.65 69.06 ± 19.13 71.42 ± 20.54 8.93 ± 1.93 0.46 ± 0.20 2.12 ± 2.01