Skip to main content
PMC home page
Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique logoLink to Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique
. 2007 May 1;98(3):217–221. doi: 10.1007/BF03403716

Association of Maternal Work with Adverse Perinatal Outcome

Mostafa A Arafa 112,✉, Taher Amine 212, Moataz Abdel Fattah 312
PMCID: PMC6975771  PMID: 17626388

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the relationship between maternal work and pregnancy outcome.

Methods

Over a 4-month period from October 2004 through February 2005, 2,419 women were interviewed shortly after delivery in the three main public and Health Insurance hospitals in Alexandria, Egypt. Of these, 730 (30.2%) were working and 1,689 (69.8%) were not working prior to delivery. A detailed description of working status was analyzed, along with a risk profile which was compared between the two groups.

Results

There was no significant association between different work characteristics and perinatal outcomes except for that between working posture, stress and delivery of smallfor-gestational-age (SGA) babies. There was an excess rate of SGA and perinatal death among the non-working group, while preterm delivery was significantly increased among those who worked throughout the whole pregnancy. After adjusting for confounders, the risk of preterm delivery was no longer significant (OR = 1.2, 95% CI = 0.96-1.7). On the other hand, working status had a beneficial effect on SGA and perinatal death (OR = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.26-0.64 and OR = 0.26, 95% CI = 0.14-0.48, respectively).

Conclusion

These results cast doubt on the risk of adverse pregnancy outcome for women who work during pregnancy. Work per se does not constitute a health risk factor and may even have a positive social impact on pregnancy. Further research on this topic in our region is recommended.

MeSH terms: Maternal work, adverse pregnancy outcome, developing countries, strenuous work

References

  • 1.Henriksen TB, Hedegaard M, Secher NJ, Wilcox AJ. Standing at work and preterm delivery. Br J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;102(3):198–206. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1995.tb09094.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Seguin RE. Pregnancy and the working woman: A review. J Ark Med Soc. 1998;95(3):115–18. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chamberlain G. Effect of work during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1985;65(5):747–50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Berkowitz GS. Employment-related physical activity and pregnancy outcome. J Am Med Womens Assoc. 1995;50(5):167–69. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Eskenazi B, Fenster L, Wight S, English P, Windham GC, Swan SH. Physical exertion as a risk factor for spontaneous abortion. Epidemiology. 1994;5:6–13. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199401000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hatch M, Ji B-T, Shu XO, Susser M. Do standing, lifting, climbing, or long hours have an effect on fetal growth? Epidemiology. 1997;8:530–36. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199709000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tan TC, Donnan SP, Chang AM. Employment, physical overactivity and adverse pregnancy outcomes—applicability of AMA guidelines in Chinese women. Asia Pac J Public Health. 1998;2:22–27. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Barnes DL, Adair LS, Popkin BM. Women’s physical activity and pregnancy outcome: A longitudinal analysis from the Philippines. Int J Epidemiol. 1999;20:162–72. doi: 10.1093/ije/20.1.162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ahlborg G. Physical work load and pregnancy outcome. J Occup Environ Med. 1995;37:941–44. doi: 10.1097/00043764-199508000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lin S, Gensburg L, Marshall EG, Roth GB, Dlugosz L. Effects of maternal work activity during pregnancy on infant malformations. J Occup Environ Med. 1998;40:829–34. doi: 10.1097/00043764-199809000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Simpson JL. Are physical activity and employment related to preterm birth and low birth weight? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;168:1231–38. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(93)90374-R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lokey EA, Tran ZV, Wells CL, Myers BC, Tran AC. Effects of physical exercise on pregnancy outcomes: A meta-analytic review. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1991;23:1234–39. doi: 10.1249/00005768-199111000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Irwin DE, Savitz DA, St Andre K, Hertz-Picciotto I. Study of occupational risk factors for pregnancy-induced hypertension among active duty enlisted Navy personnel. Am J Ind Med. 1994;25:349–59. doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700250305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Magann EF, Evans SF, Newnham JP. Employment, exertion, and pregnancy outcome: Assessment by kilocalories expended each day. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175:182–87. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9378(96)70272-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Tafari N, Naeye RL, Gobezie A. Effects of maternal undernutrition and heavy physical work during pregnancy on birth weight. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1980;87:222–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1980.tb04523.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Clapp JF, Dichstein S. Endurance exercise and pregnancy outcome. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1994;16:556–62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Tuntiserance P, Geater A, Chongsuvivatwong V, Kor-Anantakul O. The effect of heavy maternal workload on fetal growth retardation and preterm delivery. J Occup Environ Med. 1998;40:1013–20. doi: 10.1097/00043764-199811000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Florack EIM, Zielhuis GA, Rolland R. The influence of occupational physical activity on the menstrual cycle and fecundability. Epidemiology. 1994;5:14–18. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199401000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Central Agency for Public MobilizationStatistics CAPMAS . Economic participation of women in Egypt. 2001. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Egyptian human development report, 2004 (UNDP, Egypt). Available online at: http://www.aucegypt.edu/src/wsite1/index.htm (Accessed August 1, 2005).
  • 21.Working Time Regulations 1998. SI 1998 No.1833 — Health Aspects. Available online at: http://www.occhealth.co.uk/Working_time_regs. htm (Accessed March 1, 2005).
  • 22.Elo AL. Assessment of mental stress factors at work. In: Zenz C, editor. Occupational Medicine. Third edition. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 1994. pp. 945–55. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ballard JL, Khoury JC, Wedig K, Wang L, Eilers-Walsman BL, Lipp R. New Ballard score expanded to include extremely premature infants. J Pediatrics. 1991;119(3):417–23. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3476(05)82056-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Spinillo A, Capuzzo E, Baltaro F, Piazza G, Nicola S, Iasci A. The effect of work activity in pregnancy on the risk of fetal growth retardation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1996;75(6):531–36. doi: 10.3109/00016349609054666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Escriba-Aguir V, Perez-Hoyos S, Saurel-Cubizolles MJ. Physical load and psychological demand at work during pregnancy and preterm births. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2001;74(8):583–88. doi: 10.1007/s004200100259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Henriksen TB, Hedegaard M, Secher NJ. The relation between psychosocial job strain and preterm delivery and low birthweight for gestational age. Int J Epidemiol. 1994;23(4):764–74. doi: 10.1093/ije/23.4.764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hanke W, Kalinka J, Makowiec-Daboowska T, Sobala W. Heavy physical work during pregnancy — a risk factor for small-for-gestational-age babies in Poland. Am J Ind Med. 1999;36(1):200–5. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199907)36:1<200::AID-AJIM28>3.0.CO;2-Y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Zhu JL, Hjollund NH, Olsen J. National Birth Cohort in Demark. Shift work, duration of pregnancy and birth weight: The National Birth Cohort in Denmark. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191(1):285–91. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2003.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Brett KM, Strogatz DS, Savitz DA. Employment, job strain, and preterm delivery among women in North Carolina. Am J Public Health. 1997;87(2):199–204. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.87.2.199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Henriksen TB, Hedegaard M, Secher NJ. Standing and walking at work and birthweight. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1995;74(7):509–16. doi: 10.3109/00016349509024380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ceron-Mireles P, Harlow SD, Sanchez-Carrillo CI. The risk of prematurity and small for gestational age births in Mexico City: The effect of working conditions and antenatal leave. Am J Public Health. 1996;86(6):825–31. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.86.6.825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Mozurkewich EL, Luke B, Avni M, Wolf FM. Working conditions and adverse pregnancy outcome: A meta analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95(4):623–35. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(99)00598-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Gazit-Nissim S, Sheiner E, Mazor M, Shoham-Vardi I. Examining the connection between physical exertion in pregnancy and premature birth. Harefauh. 2000;138(60):444–48. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Hanke W, Saurel-Cubizolles MJ, Sobala W, Kalinka J. Employment status of pregnant women in Central Poland and the risk of preterm delivery and small-for-gestational-age infants. Eur J Public Health. 2001;11(1):23–28. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/11.1.23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Pompeii LA, Savitz DA, Evenson KR, Rogers B, Macmahon M. Physical exertion at work and the risk of preterm delivery and small-for-gestationalage birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106(6):1279–88. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000189080.76998.f8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Sydsjo A, Brynhildsen J, Selling KE, Josefsson A, Sydsjo E. Influence of rest during pregnancy on birth weight in working women. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(5):991–96. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000209194.63221.4d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Saurel-Cubizolles MJ, Zeitlin J, Lelong N, Papiernik E, Di Renzo GC, Breart G, et al. Employment, working conditions, and preterm birth: Results from the European Case Control Survey. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004;58(5):395–401. doi: 10.1136/jech.2003.008029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Henriksen TB, Savitz DA, Hedegaard M, Secher NJ. Employment during pregnancy in relation to risk factors and pregnancy outcome. Br J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;101(10):858–65. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1994.tb13546.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Saurel-Cubizolles MJ, Subtil D, Kaminski M. Is preterm delivery still related to physical working condition during pregnancy? J Epidemiol Community Health. 1991;45(1):29–34. doi: 10.1136/jech.45.1.29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Mabury MC, Linn S, Monson RR, Wegman DH, Schoenbaum SC, Stubblefield PG, et al. Work and pregnancy. J Occup Med. 1984;26(6):415–21. doi: 10.1097/00043764-198406000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Murphy JF, Dauncey M, Newcombe R, Garcia J, Elbourne D. Employment in pregnancy: Prevalence, maternal characteristics, and perinatal outcome. Lancet. 1984;1(8387):1163–66. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(84)91404-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Hanke W, Kalinka J, Szymczak W. Socialoccupational risk factors for fetal growth retardation and preterm birth. Role of occupational and non-occupational work. Med Prev. 1995;46(5):433–42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES