Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 31;177(1):175–187. doi: 10.1111/bph.14855

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Actions of IVM and FIP at b1 and c GluCl receptors. (a, b) Example currents obtained from oocytes expressing b1 GluCl receptors (a) and c GluCl receptors (b) in response to increasing concentrations of IVM. The IVM‐elicited currents were normalised to a saturating glutamate‐gated current (5 mM). (c) Group concentration–response plots of normalised IVM‐gated currents for b1 and c GluCl receptors fitted to Hill equations. The EC50s were not significantly different, whereas the maximum current for the b1 GluCl receptors was significantly smaller. (d, e) Example currents gated by an EC50 concentration of glutamate in response to increasing concentrations of FIP for b1 GluCl receptors (d) and c GluCl receptors (e). (f) Group concentration–response plots for inhibition by FIP, fitted to Hill equations. No significant difference was observed in EC50s or maximum inhibition. The clamped membrane potential was −40 mV. Data points are means ± SEM