Table 1: Methodological Quality Review (Questions and Weighting)
|
Common Criteria for both Qualitative and Quantitative Methodological Review
|
Question
|
Answer Choice
|
Score
|
Did the authors have a clearly focused question? |
Yes |
1 |
|
No |
0 |
Were inclusion/exclusion criteria used? |
Yes |
1 |
|
No |
0 |
|
Not specified |
0 |
Did the authors describe a search strategy that was comprehensive and reproducible? |
Yes |
1 |
|
No |
0 |
|
Not specified |
0 |
Please click the search strategies used |
(selected/unselected) |
a. Five or more databases: 2 |
|
|
b. Two to four databases: 1 |
|
|
c. One database: 0 |
Did search strategy cover an adequate number of years? (10+ years) |
Yes |
1 |
|
No |
0 |
Does the data support the author’s interpretation? |
Yes, mostly |
1 |
|
No |
0 |
Are there any concerns related to COI? |
Yes |
0 |
|
No |
1 |
Specific Criteria Quantitative Methodological Quality
|
Question
|
Answer Choice
|
Score
|
Did the review assess the methodological quality of the primary studies? |
Yes |
1 |
|
No |
0 |
What methods did the authors use to combine or compare results across studies? |
Meta-analyses |
2 |
|
Descriptive + quality weight |
2 |
|
Descriptive no weight |
1 |
|
Other |
0 |
How strong was the level of evidence supporting the strongest conclusions of the study? |
Level 1 (RCT) |
2 |
|
Level 2 (non-random) |
1 |
|
Level 3 (uncontrolled) |
0 |
|
Unclear |
0 |
|
|
Total score possible: 13
|