Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr;31(1):27–35. doi: 10.7171/jbt.20-3101-004

TABLE 1.

DNA concentration, yield and purity of urinary and salivary DNA

Population Urine
Saliva
Nanodrop
Qubit
Nanodrop
Qubit
DNA conc (ng/µl) Total yield (ng DNA/ml biofluid) A260/A280 DNA conc (ng/µl) Total yield (ng/ml biofluid) DNA conc (ng/µl) Total yield (ng DNA/ml biofluid) A260/A280 DNA conc (ng/µl) Total yield (ng/ml biofluid)
Girls (n = 8) 37.6 [34.3–40.5] 626 [571–675] 1.57 ± 0.22a 0.43 [0.26–0.58]b 7.20 [4.33–9.66]b 290 [284–502] 22,100 [18,800–41,700] 1.87 ± 0.04a 111 [85–160] 9690 [6700–12,500]
Boys (n = 12) 34.5 [30.4–38.2] 575 [506–637] 1.62 ± 0.08c 0.11 [0.10–0.13]b 1.83 [1.60–2.16]b 376 [264–502] 33,500 [25,900–38,300] 1.85 ± 0.05c 123 [110–176] 12,100 [8700–15,900]

Measurements were performed with Nanodrop and Qubit. Values are represented as median (interquartile range) for concentration and yield and mean ± sd for the A260/A280 ratio.

a

Significant differences (P < 0.001) were observed for the mean ratio of A260/A280 between urine and saliva for girls when using the Wilcoxon signed rank-sum test.

b

When using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, significant differences (P < 0.001) of urinary yield and concentration were observed between boys and girls, when measured by Qubit.

c

Significant differences (P < 0.001) were also observed for the mean ratio of A260/A280 between urine and saliva for boys when using the Wilcoxon signed rank-sum test.