Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 17;10:2818. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02818

TABLE 1.

Generalized linear model (GLM) showing the effects of sex, behavioral states, and types of pointing cues on the approach response (binomial distribution).

Estimate Standard error z value Pr(>| z|)
Coefficients
Intercept 0.8101 0.5163 1.569 0.117
Sex male 0.1630 0.3567 0.457 0.648
Anxious behavioral state –1.7787 0.4286 –4.150 3.33e−05∗∗∗
Neutral behavioral state 0.2967 0.4466 0.664 0.506
Dynamic distal cue –0.2409 0.4674 –0.515 0.606
Momentary distal cue –0.5891 0.4743 –1.242 0.214

The analysis revealed only a significant effect of anxious behavioral state on the approach response. “No approach” was strongly predicted by anxious behavioral states of individuals. ∗∗∗p < 0.001.