Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 25;36(4):223–231. doi: 10.5511/plantbiotechnology.19.0830a

Figure 2. Statistic summary of DNA variants identified in 95 ‘Micro-Tom’ mutants. (a–c) A histogram of (a) GATK’s genotype quality, (b) genotype determination rate, and (c) mutant allele coincidence count in the DNA variant dataset of the 95 ‘Micro-Tom’ mutants. (d) A diagram showing the frequency of mutation type in the DNA variant dataset of 95 mutants. (e) Frequencies of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and Indels in each mutation type in the DNA variant dataset of 95 mutants. (f) A histogram of mutation counts that were identified in each mutant individual. (g) Genome-wide distribution and frequency of mutations in the 95 mutants.

Figure 2. Statistic summary of DNA variants identified in 95 ‘Micro-Tom’ mutants. (a–c) A histogram of (a) GATK’s genotype quality, (b) genotype determination rate, and (c) mutant allele coincidence count in the DNA variant dataset of the 95 ‘Micro-Tom’ mutants. (d) A diagram showing the frequency of mutation type in the DNA variant dataset of 95 mutants. (e) Frequencies of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and Indels in each mutation type in the DNA variant dataset of 95 mutants. (f) A histogram of mutation counts that were identified in each mutant individual. (g) Genome-wide distribution and frequency of mutations in the 95 mutants.