Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 27;8(1):coz110. doi: 10.1093/conphys/coz110

Table 3. Model comparisons for the relationship between human-induced environmental change and reptilian baseline corticosterone, using global and US-based data sets.

Model * K DIC ΔDIC Weight
Global data, reptilian baseline (n = 108 measures from 32 species)
reptilian baseline cort ~ mass + sex + temp + precip + life history stage + max breeding attempts + life history stage*max breeding attempts (null model) 12 556.41 0 0.26
reptilian baseline cort ~ mass + sex + temp + precip + life history stage + max breeding attempts + life history stage*max breeding attempts + human footprint index 13 556.72 0.31 0.22
reptilian baseline cort ~ mass + sex + temp + precip + life history stage + max breeding attempts + life history stage*max breeding attempts + human population density 13 556.74 0.33 0.22
reptilian baseline cort ~ mass + sex + temp + precip + life history stage + max breeding attempts + life history stage*max breeding attempts + ALAN 13 557.26 0.95 0.17
reptilian baseline cort ~ mass + sex + temp + precip + life history stage + max breeding attempts + life history stage*max breeding attempts + human footprint index + ALAN + human population density 15 557.62 1.21 0.14
reptilian baseline cort ~ 1 (intercept only) 5 565.90 9.493 0
USA data, reptilian baseline (n = 227 measures from 15 species)
reptilian baseline cort ~ mass + sex + temp + precip + life history stage + max breeding attempts + life history stage*max breeding attempts (null model) 12 208.11 0 0.71
reptilian baseline cort ~ mass + sex + temp + precip + life history stage + max breeding attempts + life history stage*max breeding attempts + anthropogenic noise 13 210.60 2.49 0.20
reptilian baseline cort ~ 1 (intercept only) 5 212.34 4.24 0.09

*All models include ‘population ID’, ‘lab ID’ and ‘species’ as random effects.