Table 3.
Effect of dietary addition of medium-chain fatty acids (MCFA) on nursery pig growth performance1
Item | Added MCFA, %2 | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C6:0:C8:0:C10:03 | C6:0 | C8:0 | C10:0 | Probability, P | ||||||||||
0 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | SEM | Linear4 | Quadratic4 | C6:0 vs. control | C8:0 vs. control | C10:0 vs. control | |
BW, kg | ||||||||||||||
Day 0 | 6.7 | 6.7 | 6.7 | 6.7 | 6.7 | 6.7 | 6.7 | 6.7 | 0.07 | 0.605 | 0.641 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
Day 14 | 10.3 | 10.6 | 10.8 | 11.0 | 11.2 | 10.8 | 11.1 | 10.5 | 0.22 | <0.001 | 0.359 | 0.178 | 0.009 | 1.000 |
Day 35 | 21.5 | 22.0 | 22.7 | 22.8 | 23.2 | 22.5 | 22.8 | 22.2 | 0.34 | <0.001 | 0.177 | 0.194 | 0.033 | 0.798 |
Days 0 to 14 | ||||||||||||||
ADG, g | 255 | 275 | 294 | 305 | 323 | 297 | 314 | 269 | 12.9 | <0.001 | 0.376 | 0.105 | 0.007 | 1.000 |
ADFI, g | 331 | 333 | 343 | 365 | 376 | 353 | 373 | 325 | 13.9 | 0.003 | 0.994 | 1.000 | 0.138 | 1.000 |
G:F | 0.77 | 0.83 | 0.86 | 0.83 | 0.86 | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.82 | 0.014 | <0.001 | 0.021 | 0.004 | 0.003 | 0.044 |
Days 14 to 35 | ||||||||||||||
ADG, g | 536 | 544 | 566 | 565 | 572 | 553 | 553 | 555 | 10.1 | 0.007 | 0.245 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
ADFI, g | 829 | 814 | 842 | 868 | 855 | 837 | 834 | 834 | 16.8 | 0.052 | 0.513 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
G:F | 0.65 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.65 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.008 | 0.367 | 0.503 | 1.000 | 0.811 | 0.497 |
Days 0 to 35 | ||||||||||||||
ADG, g | 423 | 436 | 457 | 461 | 472 | 451 | 457 | 441 | 9.1 | <0.001 | 0.187 | 0.159 | 0.038 | 0.927 |
ADFI, g | 630 | 621 | 642 | 667 | 664 | 644 | 649 | 630 | 14.1 | 0.010 | 0.625 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
G:F | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.007 | 0.004 | 0.096 | 0.019 | 0.005 | 0.024 |
Feed PEDV Ct5,6 | ||||||||||||||
0 dpi | 27.1 | 29.5 | 30.9 | 30.6 | 32.4 | 29.7 | 30.0 | 28.7 | 0.27 | <0.001 | 0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.003 |
3 dpi | 28.3 | 28.3 | 29.9 | 30.9 | 32.1 | 30.5 | 29.5 | 29.9 | <0.001 | 0.745 | <0.001 | 0.061 | 0.004 |
1A total of 360 pigs [DNA 400 × 200 (Columbus, NE); initial BW = 6.7 ± 0.07 kg] were fed for 35 d in a 2-phase feeding program with 5 pigs per pen and 9 pens per treatment. Bonferroni multiple comparison adjustments were applied to contrasts comparing 0.5% inclusion of individual MCFA compared with control and 0.5% inclusion of individual MCFA compared with 0.5% MCFA blend for all response variables.
2Sigma–Aldrich (St. Louis, MO).
3Consisted of a 1:1:1 blend of C6:0, C8:0, and C10:0.
4Linear and quadratic contrast statements include control and treatments fed 1:1:1 blend of MCFA.
5Each number is the mean of 3 samples of the 11 to 23 kg diet that were inoculated with porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) 40 d following feed manufacturing with a calculated final titer of 104 TCID50/g feed. On 2 sampling days post-inoculation [dpi; day of inoculation (0 dpi) and 3 dpi], separate samples were analyzed for the presence of PEDV genetic material using qRT-PCR. Three bottles containing swine feed were not inoculated with PEDV as a negative control and analyzed on day 0, and qRT-PCR analysis did not detect genetic material using a threshold cutoff value of 45 cycles. A higher Ct value indicates a greater amount of PEDV genetic material present in the original sample. SEM representative for entire qRT-PCR analysis.
6Treatment × day, P < 0.001; Quadratic inclusion of MCFA blend × day, P = 0.023; 0 dpi C6:0 vs. 0.5% 1:1:1 and 0.5% C10:0 vs. 0.5% 1:1:1, P ≤ 0.047. SEM represents both 0 and 3 dpi.