Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 23;20:98. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7991-7

Table 6.

Indicators for Community Response levels in 50 villages in Rusizi District (2014–2015)

# CHCs % CHCS
Indicator 1: SIZE: 100 households per village in a CHC
 High > 200 3 6%
 Good 151–199 14 28%
 Average 101–150 20 40%
 Low > 100 13 26%
Indicator 2 DURATION: 24 consecutive weeks duration
 High 20+ 9 18%
 Good 17–19 20 41%
 Average 9 to 16 19 39%
 Low < 8 1 2%
Indicator 3 NUMBER: 24 meetings in each CHC
 High 20+ 4 8%
 Good 17–19 8 16%
 Average 13 to 16 29 58%
 Low 9 to 12 9 18%
 Fail < 8 0 0%
Indicator 4: TOPICS: Only one topic done per session
 High 1 topic per session 5 10%
 Average 1–4 sessions with > 1 topic 16 32%
 Low 5–8 sessions with > 1 topic 23 46%
 Poor 9–12 sessions with > 1 topic 6 12%
50 100%